Comparative analysis of the musculoskeletal health of the populations of Poland and Spain: a cross-sectional study using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

Author:

Wiśniowska-Szurlej Agnieszka1,Sozańska Agnieszka1,Barrio Sandra Jiménez2,Sozański Bernard3,Laita Luis Ceballos2,Lázaro Héctor Hernández2

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Health Sciences, College of Medical Sciences of the University of Rzeszow

2. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Valladolid, Soria,

3. Institute of Medical Sciences, College of Medical Sciences of the University of Rzeszow

Abstract

Abstract

Background Musculoskeletal disorders affect approximately 1.71 billion people worldwide and are a growing cause of disability. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) is the current framework for describing disability and provides a codification system that can be used to compare data across populations. The availability of comparable data would allow a better understanding of the determinants of health and improve the health of the population. The aim of the study was to make an ICF-based comparison between musculoskeletal health in Poland and Spain. Methods A comparative study was conducted to identify cross-cultural differences between Poland and Spain in the prevalence of ICF entities from the brief ICF core set for post-acute musculoskeletal conditions. Two datasets from previous validation studies in these populations were used for comparison. A total of 840 people with musculoskeletal conditions were included in the study. Information was recoded into ICF qualifiers to obtain comparable data. Statistical analysis included: a) calculation of absolute and relative frequencies on the prevalence of ICF entities, and b) calculation of the level of significance using the Mann-Whitney test for quantitative variables and the Chi-square test for qualitative variables. Results Significant differences in functioning were found between the two samples, with a higher prevalence in all the ICF entities for the Spanish sample. Similarities were found in the ICF components ‘Body Functions’ and ‘environmental factors’, with the most prevalent ICF entities being ‘b280 Sensation of pain’ (86.9% in Spain and 74.2% in Poland) and ‘e225 Climate’ (58.0% and 31.8%) respectively. For ‘Activities and Participation’, differences were observed, with ‘d430 Lifting and carrying objects’ being the most common for the Spanish sample (65.4%) and ‘d450 Walking’ for the Polish sample (47.7%). Conclusions A theoretical application of the ICF has been empirically tested for the first time, a milestone in the development of this research methodology. Differences in the prevalence of ICF entities showed a better musculoskeletal health in the Polish sample. Identifying the strengths and weaknesses of different health care models has the potential to improve population health by implementing best practice-based approaches. Trial registration NCT06283407

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference47 articles.

1. World Health Organization. Musculoskeletal health. Geneva. 2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/musculoskeletal-conditions. Accessed 14 Jul 2022.

2. World Health Organization. Disability. Geneva. 2023.W https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health. Accessed 7 March 2023.

3. World Health Organization. Global report on health equity for persons with disabilities. Geneva. 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240063600. Accessed 2 Dec 2022.

4. World Health Organization. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva. 2001. https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health. Accessed 21 Feb 2024.

5. World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision. Geneva. 2024. https://icd.who.int/en. Accessed 21 Jan 2024.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3