Optimal Trade Execution in Cryptocurrency Markets

Author:

Bundi Nils1,Wei Ching-Lin2,Khashanah Khaldoun3

Affiliation:

1. Zurich University of Applied Sciences

2. Shin Kong Life Insurance Co., Ltd

3. Stevens Institute of Technology

Abstract

Abstract Novel technologies allow cryptocurrency exchanges to offer innovative services that set them apart from other exchanges. In this paper we study the distinct features of cryptocurrency fee schedules and the implications for optimal trade execution. We formulate an optimal execution strategy that minimizes the trading fees charged by the exchange. We further provide a proof for the existence of an optimal execution strategy for this type of fee schedule. In fact, the optimal strategy involves both market and limit orders on various price levels. The optimal order distribution scheme depends on the market conditions expressed in terms of the distribution of limit order execution probabilities and the exchange's specific configuration of the fee schedule. Our results indicate that a strategy kernel with an exponentially decaying allocation of trade volume to price levels further away from the best price provides a superior performance and potential reduction of trade execution cost of more than 60%. The robustness of these results is confirmed in an empirical study. To our knowledge this is the first study of optimal trade execution that takes into consideration the full fee schedule of exchanges in general.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference44 articles.

1. Battalio, Robert and Corwin, Shane A. and Jennings, Robert (2016) Can Brokers Have It All? On the Relation between Make-Take Fees and Limit Order Execution Quality. The Journal of Finance 71(5): 2193-2238 https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12422

2. Madan, Dilip B and Carr, Peter P and Chang, Eric C (1998) The variance gamma process and option pricing. Review of Finance 2(1): 79-105 European Finance Association

3. Ben-Rephael, Azi and Israelsen, Ryan D (2017) Are Some Clients More Equal Than Others? An Analysis of Asset Management Companies ’ Execution Costs. Review of Finance 22(5): 1705-1736 https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfx043, 1572-3097

4. Dimitris Bertsimas and Andrew W. Lo (1998) Optimal control of execution costs. Journal of Financial Markets 1(1): 1-50 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-4181(97)00012-8, 1386-4181

5. Jeffrey R. Black (2022) {The impact of make-take fees on market efficiency}. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 58(3): 1015-1035 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-021-01016-, Stock exchanges structure their trading fees to subsidize liquidity by offering “make ” rebates for providing liquidity through limit orders and charging “take ” fees for consuming liquidity via marketable orders, leading to debate regarding the impact of these fees on market quality. Using an experiment performed by NASDAQ, I employ difference-in-differences analysis and find that a decrease in take fee and make rebate levels on one exchange leads to greater absolute pricing error and larger variance of mispricing for the market as a whole, beyond that expected from widened bid-ask spreads. This occurs because bid-ask spreads widen and fewer informative trades are executed., Make-take fees; Market efficiency; Market quality; Trading, April

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3