Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption in Ischemic Stroke is associated with Perivenous-Enhanced Cortical Veins Detected by Contrast-Enhanced Black-Blood Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Author:

Zhang Xiaoxia1,Wang Tianle2,Bai Yingnan3,Li Zhiyu1,Zhu Dan1,Cheng Ailan1,Li Yue-hua4,Lu Qing1

Affiliation:

1. Tongji University affiliated East hospital

2. Affiliated Second Hospital of Nantong University

3. Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital and Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University

4. Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Background A quantitative and visual assessment of the degree of alteration in the blood-brain barrier (BBB) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following stroke remains challenging. We aimed to explore the feasibility of using a perivenous-enhanced cortical vein (PECV) on contrast-enhanced black-blood MRI (CEBBI) to depict and classify BBB alterations in patients with ischemic stroke. Methods This retrospective study consecutively recruited 168 hospitalized patients with acute, subacute, and chronic ischemic stroke who underwent pre- and post-CEBBI. BBB alterations were classified into three groups as follows: no (NoBBBD), subtle (SuBBBD), and significant BBB disruption (SiBBBD) based on the enhancement ratio (ER) of the normal-appearing white matter before and after contrast administration, besides leptomeningeal and parenchymal enhancement displayed on CEBBI. We recorded the number of PECVs on the source of the CEBBI images in the bilateral cerebrum. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to identify and examine the variables that accounted for BBB alterations. Results Increased BBBD was associated with greater PECVs in the ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres of cerebral infarction (all p < 0.01). Fewer PECVs were delineated on the contralateral side than those on the ipsilateral side of the infarct (median: 5 vs. 3, p < 0.01). Compared with the NoBBBD group, greater PECVs were visualized on the CEBBI in participants with SuBBBD (median: 3 vs. 14, p < 0.01); we observed a significant difference between the SuBBBD and SiBBBD groups (median: 14 vs. 18, p < 0.01). The median number of PECVs of 4.5 and 8.5 in the ipsilateral hemisphere displayed 83.3% sensitivity and 83.1% specificity for discriminating NoBBBD from SuBBBD, compared with 78.5% sensitivity and 85.0% specificity for determining SuBBBD from SiBBBD, respectively. Conclusions The number of whole-brain PECVs obtained from isotropic high-resolution post-CEBBI provides a direct and semi-quantitative method for detecting and classifying BBBD in patients with cerebral infarct.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference33 articles.

1. Profaci CP, Munji RN, Pulido RS, Daneman R. The blood-brain barrier in health and disease: Important unanswered questions.J Exp Med. 2020;217(4).

2. Blood-brain barrier breakdown in acute and chronic cerebrovascular disease;Yang Y;Stroke,2011

3. Hemorrhagic transformation after ischemic stroke in animals and humans;Jickling GC;J Cereb Blood Flow Metab,2014

4. Early blood-brain barrier disruption in human focal brain ischemia;Latour LL;Ann Neurol,2004

5. Assessment of blood-brain barrier disruption using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. A systematic review;Heye AK;Neuroimage Clin,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3