Validation of the Turkish Version of the “Quality of Recovery 15 (QoR-15)” Questionnaire
Author:
Affiliation:
1. Ankara University School of Medicine
2. Aksaray University School of Medicine
3. Kayseri City Hospital
4. Antalya Research and Training Hospital
5. Cukurova University School of Medicine
6. Hacettepe University School of Medicine
Abstract
Aim The aim of this study was to perform a cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Quality of Recovery 15 questionnaire in Turkey.Methods The QoR-15 was translated into Turkish through a rigorous process involving independent translations, consensus, back-translation, and review. The questionnaire was administered to patients undergoing elective major gastrointestinal surgery preoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 7, and 30. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α and intra-class correlation coefficient. Construct validity was evaluated through confirmatory factor analysis, and responsiveness was analyzed using Cohen's effect size and standardized response mean.Results A total of 510 patients participated in the study. The Turkish version of QoR-15 (QoR-15T) demonstrated good internal consistency with Cronbach's α of 0.896 and 0.888 for preoperative and postoperative administrations, respectively. Intra-class correlation coefficient values indicated good reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the construct validity of QoR-15T. QoR-15T showed responsiveness to changes in health status, with Cohen's effect size and standardize response mean indicating its ability to detect clinically important changes.Conclusion The Turkish version of QoR-15 (QoR-15T) is a reliable, valid, and responsive questionnaire for assessing the quality of recovery in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Its ability to capture patients' perspectives and multidimensional aspects of recovery makes it a valuable tool for clinical and research purposes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. Understanding the meaning of recovery to patients undergoing abdominal surgery;Rajabiyazdi F;JAMA Surg,2021
2. What does it really mean to “recover”;Lee L;from an operation? Surgery,2014
3. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40;Myles PS;Br J Anaesth,2000
4. The 8-item short-form health survey and the physical comfort composite score of the quality of recovery 40-item scale provide the most responsive assessments of pain, physical function, and mental function during the first 4 days after ambulatory knee surgery with regional anesthesia;Bost JE;Anesth Analg,2007
5. Effect of patient sex on general anaesthesia and recovery;Buchanan FF;Br J Anaesth,2011
1.学者识别学者识别
2.学术分析学术分析
3.人才评估人才评估
"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370
www.globalauthorid.com
TOP
Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司 京公网安备11010802033243号 京ICP备18003416号-3