Water electrolysis technologies in the future – projection of environmental impacts and levelized costs until 2045

Author:

Koj Jan Christian1,Zapp Petra1,Wieland Christoph2,Görner Klaus3,Kuckshinrichs Wilhelm1

Affiliation:

1. Forschungszentrum Jülich

2. University of Duisburg-Essen

3. Gas- und Wärme-Institut Essen

Abstract

Abstract Background To limit climate change and reduce further harmful environmental impacts the reduction and substitution of fossil energy carriers is a main challenge for the next decades. Recently, during the United Nations Climate Change Conference COP28, the participants agreed on the beginning of the end of the fossil fuel era. Hydrogen, when produced using renewable energy, can be a substitute for fossil fuel carriers and enables the storage of the renewable energy, leading into a post-fossil age. This paper presents environmental impacts as well as levelized costs along the life cycle of water electrolysis technologies for hydrogen production. Methods The applied methodological approaches are Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Costing (LCC), both life cycle-oriented and based on consistent data sources and detailed assessments of prospective technological developments and their effects on environmental and economic indicators. The considered technological developments include electricity and critical raw material demand decreases on the one hand and lifetime as well as electrolysis capacity increases on the other hand. The objectives of the investigations are AEC, PEMEC, and SOEC as the currently most mature water electrolysis technologies for hydrogen production. Results The environmental impacts and life cycle costs provoked by the hydrogen production will significantly decrease in the long term (up to 2045). For the case of Germany, worst-case climate change results for 2022 are 27.5 kg CO2eq./kg H2. Considering technological improvements, electrolysis operation with wind power and a clean heat source, a reduction to 1.33 kg CO2eq./kg H2 can be achieved by 2045 in the best-case. The electricity demand of the electrolysis technologies is the main contributor to environmental impacts and levelized costs in most considered cases. Conclusions A unique combination of possible technological, environmental, and economic developments in the production of green hydrogen up to the year 2045 is presented. Based on a comprehensive literature research, several research gaps, like a combined comparison of all three technologies by LCA and LCC, were identified and research questions were posed and answered. Consequently, prospective research should not be limited to one water electrolysis but should be carried out with an openness to all three technologies. Furthermore, it is shown that data from the literature for the LCA and LCC of water electrolysis technologies differ considerably in some cases. Therefore, extensive research into the material inventories for plant construction is needed, but also into the energy and mass balances of plant operation, for a corresponding analysis. Even for today’s plants, the availability and transparency of literature data is still low and must be expanded.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference72 articles.

1. H. Lee, K. Calvin, D. Dasgupta, G. Krinner, A. Mukherji, P. Thorne, C. Trisos, J. Romero, P. Aldunce, K. Barrett, G. Blanco, W.W.L. Cheung, S.L. Connors, F. Denton, A. Diongue-Niang, D. Dodman, M. Garschagen, O. Geden, B. Hayward, C. Jones, F. Jotzo, T. Krug, R. Lasco, J.-Y. Lee, V. Masson-Delmotte, M. Meinshausen, K. Mintenbeck, A. Mokssit, F.E.L. Otto, M. Pathak, A. Pirani, E. Poloczanska, H.-O. Pörtner, A. Revi, D.C. Roberts, J. Roy, A.C. Ruane, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, R. Slade, A. Slangen, Y. Sokona, A.A. Sörensson, M. Tignor, D.v. Vuuren, Y.-M. Wei, H. Winkler, P. Zhai, Z. Zommers, Synthesis Report (SYR) of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) - Longer Report (first published version without location, final editing and layout), IPCC, 2023.

2. Utilisation of excess electricity in different Power-to-Transport chains and their environmental assessment;Koj JC;Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,2018

3. H. Steinmüller, G. Reiter, R. Tichler, C. Friedl, M. Furtlehner, J. Lindorfer, M. Schwarz, M. Koppe, P. Biegger, A. Felder, M. Lehner, M. Harasek, A. Makaruk, M. Miltner, M. Fraubaum, M. Haider, S. Begluk, W. Gawlik, C. Maier, R. Haas, A. Ajanovic, Power to Gas - eine Systemanalyse: Markt- und Technologiescouting und -analyse, 2014.

4. Review and meta-analysis of recent life cycle assessments of hydrogen production;Wilkinson J;Cleaner Environmental Systems,2023

5. Environmental impacts of power-to-X systems - A review of technological and methodological choices in Life Cycle Assessments;Koj JC;Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3