Quantitative flow ratio vs. angiography- only guided PCI in STEMI patients: a one- year outcomes

Author:

Barauskas Mindaugas1,Žiubrytė Greta1,Jodka Nojus1,Unikas Ramūnas1

Affiliation:

1. Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences

Abstract

Abstract Background Coronary physiology-guided PCIs are recommended worldwide. However, invasive coronary physiology methods prolong the procedure, make additional risks for the patients, and prolong the fluoroscopy time for an interventional cardiologist. Otherwise, there is a non-invasive coronary physiology evaluation method QFR, which can be safely used even in STEMI patients. Methods 198 patients admitted with STEMI and at least one intermediate (35–75%) diameter stenosis other than culprit artery between July 2020 and June 2021 have been prospectively included in this single-centre study. All patients were randomized into one of two groups (1 - QFR-guided PCI; 2 - visual-estimation-only guided PCI). A 12-month follow-up with echocardiography, exercise stress test, and quality of life evaluation was performed in all included patients. For the QOF evaluation, the Seattle angina score questionnaire was chosen. Statistical analysis was performed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Stjudent T, Mann-Whitney, Pearson Chi-square tests and Kaplan Meier survival analysis. Results 98 (49.5%) patients were randomized to the first group, and 100 (50.5%) patients were included in the second group. Statistically, significantly more patients had a medical history of dyslipidaemia (98 vs 91, p = 0.002) and slightly better left ventricular ejection fraction (42.21 ± 7.88 vs 39.45 ± 9.62, p = 0.045) in the QFR group. Six times fewer patients required non-culprit artery revascularization within 12-month FU in the QFR group (1.02% vs 6%, p = 0.047). Survival analysis proved that patients in the Angio group had more than 6-time greater risk for death within a 12-month period after MI (OR 6.23, 95% CI 2.20-17.87, p = 0.006), with the highest mortality risk within the first two months after initial treatment. Conclusions Using QFR in non-culprit lesions for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction reduces mortality rate and revascularization in 12-month follow-up and increases the patient's quality of life. Trial registration The study was approved by the Regional Bioethical Committee and conducted under the principles of the Helsinki Declaration and local laws and regulations.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3