The Validity and IRT Psychometric Analysis of Chinese Version of Difficult Doctor-Patient Relationship Questionnaire (DDPRQ-10)

Abstract

Abstract Objective: The doctor-patient relationship (DPR) plays a crucial role in Chinese healthcare system, functioning in improve medical quality and reducing medical costs. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Difficult Doctor-Patient Relationship Questionnaire (DDPRQ-10) among general hospital inpatients in China. Methods: The research recruited 38 resident doctors responsible for 120 participants, and factor analyses were used to assess the construct validity of the scale. Convergent validity was evaluated by examining the correlation between DDPRQ-10 and depressive symptoms, burnout, and self-efficacy, using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale-9 item (PHQ-9), and the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). Both multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) and unidimensional item response theory (IRT) frameworks were used to estimate the parameters of each item. Results: The Chinese version of DDPRQ-10 showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.931), and fitted in a modified two-factor model of positive feelings and negative feelings (χ2/df = 1.494, GFI = 0.925, RMSEA = 0.071, SRMR = 0.008, CFI = 0.985, NFI = 0.958, NNFI = 0.980, TLI = 0.980, IFI = 0.986). Significant correlations with PHQ-9 with DDPRQ-10 and both subscales were revealed (r = 0.293~0.333, p < .001), while DDPRQ-10 score also significantly correlated with doctors’ MBI score (r = -0.467, p< .001). The MIRT model of full scale and IRT models of both subscales showed high discrimination of all items (a = 2.30~10.18), and the test information within the range of low-quality relationship was relatively high. Conclusion: The Chinese version of DDPRQ-10 displayed satisfactory reliability and validity, and thus was appropriate for measuring the DPR in Chinese medical settings.