Affiliation:
1. Fuzhou University
2. University of Hamburg: Universitat Hamburg
Abstract
Abstract
In clinical operations, it is crucial for surgeons to know the location of the surgical instrument. Traditional positioning systems have difficulty dealing with camera occlusion, marker occlusion, and environmental interference.To address these issues, we propose a distributed visual positioning system for surgical instrument tracking in surgery.First, we design the marker pattern with a black and white triangular grid and dot that can be adapted to various instrument surfaces and improve the marker location accuracy of the feature.The cross-points in the marker are the features that each feature has a unique ID.Furthermore, we proposed detection and identification for the position-sensing marker to realize the accurate location and identification of features.Second, we introduce mPnP (multi Perspective-n-Point) method, which fuses feature coordinates from all cameras to deduce the final result directly by the intrinsic and extrinsic parameters.This method provides a reliable initial value for the Bundle Adjustment algorithms.During instrument tracking, we assess the motion state of the instrument and select either dynamic or static Kalman filtering to mitigate any jitter in the instrument's movement.The core algorithms comparison experiment indicates our positioning algorithm has a lower reprojection error comparison to the mainstream algorithms.A series of quantitative experiments showed that the proposed system positioning error is below 0.207 mm, and the run time is below 118.842 ms.T he results demonstrate the tremendous clinical application potential of our system providing accurate positioning of instruments promoting the efficiency and safety of clinical surgery.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. Mezger, Uli and Jendrewski, Claudia and Bartels, Michael (2013) Navigation in surgery. Langenbeck's archives of surgery 398: 501-514 Journal Article, 1435-2443
2. Jung, Ronald E. and Schneider, David and Ganeles, Jeffrey and Wismeijer, Daniel and Zwahlen, Marcel and Haemmerle, Christoph H. F. and Tahmaseb, Ali (2009) Computer Technology Applications in Surgical Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 24: 92-109 Journal Article, ://WOS:000270908400007, 0882-2786
3. Hassfeld, S. and Muhling, J. (2000) Comparative examination of the accuracy of a mechanical and an optical system in CT and MRT based instrument navigation. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 29(6): 400-407 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0901-5027(00)80069-7, Journal Article, ://WOS:000166529600002, 0901-5027
4. Ungi, Tamas and Abolmaesumi, Purang and Jalal, Rayhan and Welch, Mattea and Ayukawa, Irene and Nagpal, Simrin and Lasso, Andras and Jaeger, Melanie and Borschneck, Daniel P. and Fichtinger, Gabor and Mousavi, Parvin (2012) Spinal Needle Navigation by Tracked Ultrasound Snapshots. Ieee Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 59(10): 2766-2772 https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2012.2209881, Journal Article, ://WOS:000308989000009, 0018-9294
5. Gao, Cong and Phalen, Henry and Sefati, Shahriar and Ma, Justin and Taylor, Russell and Unberath, Mathias and Armand, Mehran (2022) Fluoroscopic Navigation for a Surgical Robotic System Including a Continuum Manipulator. Ieee Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 69(1): 453-464 https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2021.3097631, Journal Article, ://WOS:000733943200049, 0018-9294