The impact of surgery on butterfly gliomas - A real-life study of biopsy vs. surgical resection

Author:

Picarelli Helder1,Medeiros Vitor Macedo Brito2,Castro Pedro Henrique Fonseca2,Carneiro Guilherme Bezerra2,Matsumura Bruno Massanori2,Cordeiro Augusto Magno Tranquezi2,Yamaki Vitor Nagai2,Figueiredo Eberval Gadelha2,Teixeira Manoel Jacobsen2

Affiliation:

1. Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo

2. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

Abstract

Abstract

Background Despite the extent of resection affecting the overall survival of patients with gliomas, cytoreduction in patients with butterfly gliomas (BG) remains controversial. Contemporary studies suggest that wide removal is feasible, but there is a lack of controlled, randomized, multicenter studies on the subject. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of safe maximal surgical resection (SMSR) as a primary treatment strategy in patients with BG. Methods 30 consecutive patients, primarily treated with neurosurgery, were categorized into Group-A when SMSR was equal to or greater than 50% and Group-B when it was less than 50% (biopsy). The groups were studied and compared for clinical, epidemiological, functionality, survival time (ST), and progression-free survival (PFS) characteristics. Results were analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics. Results The most frequent tumors were glioblastoma IDH-wild type, WHO grade 4. Most patients (80%) had KPS < 70%, however, there was no significant worsening of functionality associated with interventions. Wider resection (Group-A) was associated with a better Kaplan-Meier curve and ST (68.35 versus 17.32 weeks, p = 0.014). PFS was also longer in this group (57.70 versus 4.77 weeks, p = 0.012). In multivariate analysis, resections > 50% were associated with reduced risk of recurrence (HR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.06–0.67, p = 0.009). Complication rates and functional decline were similar between groups. Conclusion Surgical resections (> 50%) in patients with BG improved ST and PFS without a significant increase in morbidity and dysfunction.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3