General Practitioner perceptions and experiences of managing perinatal mental health: a scoping review

Author:

Frayne Jacqueline1,Seddon Sarah1,Lebedevs Tamara2,Milroy Talila1,Teh Beverly3,Nguyen Thinh4

Affiliation:

1. The University of Western Australia

2. King Edward Memorial Hospital

3. South Metropolitan Health Services

4. Peel and Rockingham Kwinana Mental Health Services

Abstract

Abstract Background General Practitioners (GPs) manage the majority of preconception, early pregnancy, and postnatal care. Overall, mental health remains a significant contributor to disease burden affecting 1 in 4 pregnant women. Psychotropic medication prescribing occurs in almost 1 in 12 pregnancies, and appears to be increasing, along with the prevalence of mental health disorders in women of reproductive age. Perinatal mental health management is therefore not an unlikely scenario within their clinical practice. This scoping review aims to map current research related to GPs perceptions and experiences managing perinatal mental health, particularly exploring their experiences of diagnosis, medication use, guideline adherence and management of care. Method A comprehensive search strategy using nine electronic databases, and grey literature was undertaken between December 2021 and February 2023. Relevant studies were sourced from peer review databases using key terms related to perinatal mental health and general practitioners. Search results were screened on title, abstract and full text to assess those meeting inclusion criteria and relevance to the research question. Results After screening, 16 articles were included in the scoping review. The majority of articles focused on perinatal depression. Findings support that GPs are largely confident with diagnosing perinatal depression. However, over the last two decades, prescribing confidence in perinatal mental health remains variable with concerns for the safety profile of medication, low level of confidence in providing information and a strong reliance on personal experience. Despite the establishment of perinatal guidelines by countries, the utilisation of these and other existing resources by GPs appears to be infrequent. Many challenges exist for GPs around time pressures, a lack of information and resources, and difficulty accessing referral to services. Conclusion Recommendations following this scoping review include targeted perinatal education programs specific for GPs and embedded in training programs. The development of practice guidelines and resources specific to general practice that recognises time, services, and funding limitations. Future research is needed on how guidelines and resources can be developed and best delivered to optimise GP engagement to improve knowledge and enhance patient care.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3