Design Principles Supporting Data-driven Decisions Platforms

Author:

Elragal Ahmed1,Elgendy Nada2

Affiliation:

1. Luleå University of Technology

2. University of Oulu

Abstract

Abstract

The digital transformation of organizations and societies and the increasing availability of big data and analytics make decision-making more complex and dynamic. This challenge is likely to continue and accelerate. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a new scientific approach to facilitate decision-making based on evidence from data. Quite recently, organizations have begun relying on machines to make decisions. So, this leaves us astray about designing data-driven decision platforms to enable humans and machines to collaborate toward organizational decision-making. Incorporating data and algorithms into decision-making addresses existing challenges and brings new ones. Therefore, to enable data-driven decisions, data-driven platforms are needed. However, existing platforms need the principles that ought to exist to foster insight-driven choices in organizations. We argue that a consolidated normative theory must be required for designing data-driven decision platforms. This is problematic because it hinders the ability of organizations to become data-driven concerning how they make decisions. Accordingly, we have posited and evaluated a set of design principles to support data-driven decision platforms, following design science research methodology. Our overarching purpose is to present the posited design principles and the preliminary results from their qualitative evaluation and to contribute to developing design principles, enabling researchers and practitioners to augment them into instantiations of various data-driven decision platforms.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference85 articles.

1. Alsharef, A., Aggarwal, K., Kumar, M. and Mishra, A., 2022. Review of ML and AutoML solutions to forecast time-series data. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, pp.1–15.

2. Bailey, D.E., Barley, S.R., 2019. Beyond design and use: How scholars should study intelligent technologies. Information and Organization. Published online on 26 December 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.100286

3. “Design Science Research Contributions: Finding a Balance between Artifact and Theory;Baskerville R;Journal of the Association for Information Systems,2018

4. Baskerville, R., Myers, M. and Yoo, Y. (2020). Digital First: The Ontological Reversal and New Challenges for Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 509–523/June 2020.

5. Bean, R., and Davenport, T.H. (2019). Companies Are Failing in Their Efforts to Become Data-Driven, Harvard Business Review.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3