“Pouring their heart out in Sainsbury’s”: qualitative study of young people’s, parents’ and mental health practitioners’ experiences of adapting to remote online mental health appointments during Covid-19

Author:

Biddle Lucy1,Derges Jane1,Cliffe Bethany1,Gooberman-Hill Rachael2,Linton Myles-Jay1,Moran Paul1,Bould Helen1

Affiliation:

1. Bristol University Medical School

2. Bristol University Medical School, Southmead Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, technologies such as videoconferencing were used to deliver mental health appointments remotely online. For many people, this was a change from previous methods of mental healthcare receipt and delivery. We aimed to explore in-depth how practitioners, young people and parents in the UK experienced this transition. Methods We used qualitative methods to collect data, triangulating between free-text online survey data (n = 38), focus groups (n = 5, 3 young adult groups (total n = 11), 2 practitioner groups (total n = 7)) and semi-structured interviews (practitioners n = 8; parents n = 4). Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Participants held mixed views. While appointments at home could be regarded as more comfortable, naturalistic and accessible, it was also recognised that remoteness compromised practitioner control with consequences for their ability to monitor patient engagement, manage risk and ensure confidentiality when others were present in the home. This could create an additional burden for parents as they tried to facilitate appointments but felt unsupported in this role. Relatedly, remoteness was seen to hinder interpersonal communication, formation of trust, communication of empathy and opportunities to observe body language, all of which were deemed important to building and maintaining effective therapeutic relationships. Despite this, others thought the anonymity of a remote exchange may allow earlier disclosure. There was disagreement as to whether remote provision narrowed or expanded the scope of practice. Conclusions While some had positive views of remote mental health appointments, others found them challenging. Findings highlight key areas requiring attention and mitigation in future offerings of remote provision, namely: risk management, parental burden, and problematic engagement.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference29 articles.

1. American Psychiatric Association. (2020, June 5). Psychologists embrace telehealth to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Https://Www.Apaservices.Org. https://www.apaservices.org/practice/legal/technology/psychologists-embrace-telehealth.

2. Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on remote mental healthcare and prescribing in psychiatry: an electronic health record study;Patel R;BMJ Open,2021

3. NHS England. (2017). Next Steps on the NHS Five Year Forward View. https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/next-steps-on-the-nhs-five-year-forward-view/.

4. The Pace of Technologic Change: Implications for Digital Health Behavior Intervention Research;Patrick K;Am J Prev Med,2016

5. An online survey of young adolescent girls’ use of the internet and smartphone apps for mental health support;Grist R;BJPsych Open,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3