Open-label placebos: A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies with non-clinical samples

Author:

Spille Lukas1,Fendel Johannes Caspar2,Seuling Patrik1,Göritz Anja Simone1,Schmidt Stefan2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, Occupational Psychology, University of Freiburg

2. Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg

Abstract

Abstract Background: The use of open-label placebos (OLPs) has been shown to be effective in clinical trials. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine whether OLPs are effective in experimental studies with non-clinical populations. Methods: We searched five electronic databases on April 15, 2021. We conducted separate analyses for self-reported and objective outcomes and examined whether the level of suggestiveness of the instructions influenced the effectiveness of OLPs. Results: Of 3,573 identified records, 20 studies comprising 1,201 participants were included. We found a significant effect of OLPs for self-reported outcomes (SMD=0.43; 95% CI=0.28, 0.58; I2=7.2%) but not for objective outcomes (SMD=-0.02; 95% CI=-0.25, 0.21; I2=43.6%). The level of suggestiveness of the instructions influenced the effectiveness of OLPs for objective outcomes (p=.02), but not for self-reported outcomes. Discussion: OLPs appear to be effective when examined in experimental studies. However, the small number of studies highlights the need for further research.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference52 articles.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3