Affiliation:
1. Columbia University Irving Medical Center
2. Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Standard Breast Cancer (BC) risk prediction models based only on epidemiologic factors generally have quite poor performance, and there have been a number of risk scores proposed to improve them, such as AI-based mammographic information, polygenic risk scores and pathogenic variants. Even with these additions BC risk prediction performance is still at best moderate. In that decreased DNA repair capacity (DRC) is a major risk factor for development of cancer, we investigated the potential to improve BC risk prediction models by including a measured phenotypic DRC assay:
Methods
Using blood samples from the Breast Cancer Family Registry we assessed the performance of phenotypic markers of DRC in 46 matched pairs of individuals, one from each pair with BC (with blood drawn before BC diagnosis) and the other from controls matched by age and time since blood draw. We assessed DRC in thawed cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) by measuring γ-H2AX yields (a marker for DNA double-strand breaks) at multiple times from 1 to 20 hrs after a radiation challenge. The studies were performed using surface markers to discriminate between different PBMC subtypes.
Results
The parameter Fres, the residual damage signal in PBMC B cells at 20 hrs post challenge, was the strongest predictor of breast cancer with an AUC (Area Under receiver-operator Curve) of 0.89 [95% Confidence Interval: 0.84–0.93] and a BC status prediction accuracy of 0.80. To illustrate the combined use of a phenotypic predictor with standard BC predictors, we combined Fres in B cells with age at blood draw, and found that the combination resulted in significantly greater BC predictive power (AUC of 0.97 [95% CI: 0.94–0.99]), an increase of 13 percentage points over age alone.
Conclusions
If replicated in larger studies, these results suggest that inclusion of a fingerstick-based phenotypic DRC blood test has the potential to markedly improve BC risk prediction.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference70 articles.
1. Breast cancer: Risk assessment, screening, and primary prevention;Michaels E;Med Clin North Am,2023
2. American Cancer Society, ACS. Key Statistics for Breast Cancer; 2023. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/about/how-common-is-breast-cancer.html
3. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC. Breast Cancer Statistics; 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/breast/statistics/
4. Global cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends–an update;Torre LA;Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev,2016
5. Management of breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: global perspectives;Bajpai J;Expert Rev Anticancer Ther,2022