Affiliation:
1. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
2. University of Cambridge
Abstract
Abstract
The relative role of place and temporal mechanisms in auditory frequency discrimination was assessed for a centre frequency of 2 kHz. Four measures of frequency discrimination were obtained for 63 normal-hearing participants: detection of frequency modulation using modulation rates of 2 Hz (FM2) and 20 Hz (FM20); detection of a change in frequency across successive pure tones (difference limen for frequency, DLF); and detection of changes in the temporal fine structure of bandpass filtered complex tones centred at 2 kHz (TFS). Previous work has suggested that: FM2 depends on the use of both temporal and place cues; FM20 depends primarily on the use of place cues because the temporal mechanism cannot track rapid changes in frequency; DLF depends primarily on temporal cues; TFS depends exclusively on temporal cues. This led to the following predicted patterns of the correlations of scores across participants: DLF and TFS should be highly correlated; FM2 should be correlated with DLF and TFS; FM20 should not be correlated with DLF or TFS. The results were broadly consistent with these predictions, supporting the idea that frequency discrimination at 2 kHz depends partly or primarily on temporal cues except for frequency modulation detection at a high rate.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference54 articles.
1. von Békésy, G. Experiments in Hearing 1-745 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960).
2. Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea;Robles L;Physiol. Rev.,2001
3. Die elementaren Grundlagen zur Bestimmung der Informationskapazität des Gehörs (The foundations for determining the information capacity of the auditory system);Zwicker E;Acustica,1956
4. Place code for pitch: A necessary revision;Zwislocki JJ;Acta Otolaryngol.,1999
5. Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey;Rose JE;J. Neurophysiol.,1967