Abstract
Abstract
Background
Universal access to sexual and reproductive health services is a global priority. Yet barriers to abortion access remain, including legal restrictions, cost, stigma, and limited availability of services and information. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated barriers to abortion care. The aim was to identify barriers to and facilitators of abortion by examining experiences of access during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods
This qualitative phenomenological study examined abortion access during the pandemic in Australia, where abortion is decriminalised. We used social media and flyers in clinics to recruit adults who sought abortion care since March 2020, then conducted in-depth interviews. We mapped participant experiences to five dimensions of access identified by Levesque et al.’s patient-centred access to healthcare framework: approachability, acceptability, availability and accommodation, affordability, and appropriateness.
Results
The 24 participants lived across Australia and sought abortion in a range of pandemic-related restrictions. Approachability: Most lacked information about abortion and where to seek it. Acceptability: Many were uncomfortable disclosing their abortion to family, friends, and healthcare providers, and providers demonstrated varying levels of support. Availability and accommodation: Regional participants travelled far and faced long wait-times, exacerbated by pandemic restrictions. Affordability: Participants described financial stress paying for the service, travel, and related expenses. Appropriateness: Most participants expected judgement in care. Providers commonly assumed they wanted to remain pregnant, and some provided unempathetic and rushed care. Some participants reported non-judgmental and supportive services with appropriate emotional support and time spent with providers.
Discussion
Abortion seekers experienced varying obstacles when seeking care, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Challenges during the pandemic illustrated the importance of ensuring social support during care and choice between abortion modalities and service types. The findings illustrate the need for population- and system-level initiatives such as: providing accurate information about and normalising abortion; implementing system-level efforts to reduce wait times, travel, and costs, especially for rural populations; and developing regulatory and quality improvement initiatives to increase the workforce and its readiness to provide high-quality, non-judgemental abortion care. Consumer voices can help understand the diverse pathways to abortion care and inform solutions to overcome the multidimensional barriers to access.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference90 articles.
1. Enabling access to quality abortion care: WHO's Abortion Care guideline;Kim CR;Lancet Glob Health,2022
2. World Health Organization & United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). Report of the International Conference on Primary Health Care. Alma-Ata, USSR, 6–12 September 1978. World Health Organization Geneva. 1978. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/39228 Accessed 19 Mar 2022.
3. Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations;Levesque J-F;Int J Equity Health,2013
4. I didn’t feel judged’: exploring women’s access to telemedicine abortion in rural Australia;Ireland S;J Prim Health Care,2020
5. It was close enough, but it wasn't close enough”: A qualitative exploration of the impact of direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion on access to abortion care;Kerestes CDR;Contraception,2021