The Impact of Expanded Access Programs for Systemic Anticancer Therapy in an Irish Cancer Centre

Author:

Cronin Timothy K1,Ronayne Cian2,O’Donovan Niamh2,McGuinness Eimear3,Cooke Katie3,Dennehy Maeve4,Dennehy Colum2,Power Derek G4,Cahill Mary R2,Collins Dearbhaile C2,Connolly Roisin M2,Bambury Richard M2,Mykytiv Vitaliy2,Higgins Michaela J5,Noonan Sinéad A2,O'Reilly Seamus2

Affiliation:

1. University College Cork

2. Cork University Hospital

3. South Infirmary Victoria University Hospital

4. Mercy University Hospital

5. St Vincent’s University Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Expanded access programs (EAPs) allow patients with cancer who have unmet clinical needs to obtain access to pre-authorisation treatments. There is no standardised process or registry for implementing these programs nationally and real world data on their impact is lacking. We evaluated their prevalence and impact in a cancer centre.Methods Data relating to adult cancer patients treated via EAPs from 2011 to 2021 in three Cork university hospitals was collated. Descriptive statistics were employed to get an overview of the impact these programs currently have on cancer care provision.Results We identified 193 patients who accessed EAPs during the study period, availing of 33 separate drugs for a total of 50 different cancer indications. The prevalence of EAP usage was shown to have been trending upwards in recent years with a total of 189 programs being accessed throughout the period. Drugs provided were from a number of different anti-cancer drug classes, particularly targeted therapies (n = 18) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (n = 17). Cancers from a wide range of both solid and liquid tumour types were identified as having been treated with EAP drugs and patients treated were from across a broad spectrum of ages (26–82, SD:11.99).Conclusion EAPs have an increasing role in access to novel cancer therapies in our community and by extension nationally. Equity of EAP access would be facilitated by a national registry of available agents which we have now established. Assessment of their benefits and toxicities would be enhanced by the requirement for a real world data base as a condition of EAP approval.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference17 articles.

1. Understanding the Right to Try Act;Agarwal R;Clin Cancer Res,2020

2. Authority, M. a. H. P. R. (2022). Scientific opinion statistics. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1066820/EAMS_SO_stats_April_2022.csv/preview

3. An overview of Compassionate Use Programs in the European Union member states;Balasubramanian G;Intractable Rare Dis Res,2016

4. Temporary authorization for use: does the French patient access programme for unlicensed medicines impact market access after formal licensing?;Degrassat-Théas A;Pharmacoeconomics,2013

5. Expanded access to investigational drugs: balancing patient safety with potential therapeutic benefits;Fountzilas E;Expert Opin Investig Drugs,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3