A service evaluation of non-contact vision-based patient monitoring technology for patients in a high-secure forensic psychiatric hospital: a qualitative study

Author:

Dewa Lindsay H1,Broyd Josephine2,Hira Rita2,Dudley Alison2,Hafferty Jonathan D2,Bates Robert2,Aylin Paul1

Affiliation:

1. Imperial College London

2. West London NHS Trust

Abstract

Abstract Background Technology has the potential to monitor patient safety in real-time that helps staff and without disturbing the patient. However, staff and patients’ perspectives on using passive monitoring within an inpatient setting is lacking. The study aim was to explore stakeholders’ perspectives about using Oxehealth passive monitoring technology within a high-secure forensic psychiatric hospital in the UK as part of a wider mixed-methods service evaluation. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff and patients with experience of using Oxehealth technology face-to-face within a private room in Broadmoor Hospital. We applied thematic analysis to the data of each participant group separately. Themes and sub-themes were integrated, finalised, and presented in a thematic map. Design, management, and analysis was meaningfully informed by both staff and patients. Results Twenty-four participants were interviewed (n = 12 staff, n = 12 patients). There were seven main themes: detecting deterioration and improving health and safety, “Big Brother Syndrome”, privacy and dignity, knowledge and understanding, acceptance, barriers to use and practice issues and future changes needed. Oxehealth technology was considered acceptable to both staff and patients if the technology was used to detect deterioration and improve patient’s safety providing patient’s privacy was not invaded. However, overall acceptance was lower when knowledge and understanding of the technology and its camera was limited. Most patients could not understand why both physical checks through bedroom windows, and Oxehealth was needed to monitor patients, whilst staff felt Oxehealth should not replace physical checks of patients as it is mainly there to reassure staff on patient safety. Conclusions Oxehealth technology is considered viable and acceptable by both staff and patients. However, more support and education is needed for new patients and staff to better understand how it works in the short- and long-term. A feasibility study or pilot trial to compare the impact of Oxehealth with and without physical checks may be needed.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference18 articles.

1. Patient safety in inpatient mental health settings: a systematic review;Thibaut B;BMJ Open,2019

2. Predicting Inpatient Aggression in Forensic Services Using Remote Monitoring Technology: Qualitative Study of Staff Perspectives;Greer B;J Med Internet Res,2019

3. Kamphuis J, Dijk DJ, Spreen M, Lancel M. The relation between poor sleep, impulsivity and aggression in forensic psychiatric patients. In: Physiol Behav. vol. 123; 2014: 168–173.

4. Sleep at night and association to aggressive behaviour; Patients in a Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit;Langsrud K;Psychiatry Res,2018

5. How does Oxevision work?. [https://www.oxehealth.com/oxevision].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3