Intentional non-adherence to official medical recommendations: An irrational choice or negative experience with the healthcare system?

Author:

Purić Danka1,Petrović Marija B.1,Živanović Marko1,Lukić Petar1,Zupan Zorana1,Branković Marija2,Ninković Milica1,Lazarević Ljiljana1,Stanković Sanda1,Žeželj Iris1

Affiliation:

1. University of Belgrade

2. Singidunum University

Abstract

Abstract Background: The World Health Organization recognizes non-adherence to treatment recommendations as a growing global problem. Questionnaires typically focus on only one non-adhering behavior, e.g., medication-taking, and target people with specific health conditions. In this preregistered study, we aimed to (1) develop a novel instrument suitable to the general population, consisting of non-adherence to prescribed therapy, self-medication, and avoidance to seek medical treatment, capturing intentional non-adherence (iNAR), (2) differentiate it from habitual non-adherence, such as smoking, and (3) relate iNAR to patient-related factors, such as sociodemographics, health status, and endorsement of irrational beliefs (conspiratorial thinking and superstitions), and to a set of healthcare-related beliefs and experiences. Methods: First, medical doctors provided a list of non-adherence behaviors in a focus group. To this list we added behaviors that fitted our definition of intentional non-adherence, identified in a thorough literature search. This initial list of 22 behaviors was further refined by a public health expert. The instrument was then tested on a sample of 583 participants, sufficiently powered to detect effects for all preregistered statistical analysis. Participants were recruited using an online snowballing procedure and via social networks. Results: Factor analysis yielded a one-factor solution, and the final 12-item iNAR questionnaire had satisfactory internal reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = .72). A hierarchical linear regression showed that, as expected, health condition variables and healthcare-related beliefs and experiences accounted for 14% of the variance of iNAR behaviors, whereas sociodemographics and irrational beliefs did not additionally contribute. In comparison, the same regression model with smoking (representative of habitual non-adherence) as a criterion variable, accounted for less than 3% of the variance, with education as the only significant predictor. Conclusions: We have constructed a brief, comprehensive, and reliable measure of iNAR behaviors. Normalization of patients’ passivity and, in particular, negative experiences with the healthcare system contributed to intentional, but not habitual non-adherence. We believe that public health interventions designed to discourage intentional non-adherence should foremost attempt to improve all patients' experiences with the system and build trust with their healthcare practitioners rather than aim at specific demographic groups or at correcting patients' unfounded beliefs.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference59 articles.

1. World Health Organization. Adherence to long-term therapies: Evidence for action. 2003. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42682/9241545992.pdf.

2. World Health Organization. Ten threats to global health in 2019. 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019.

3. Haynes R, McDonald H, Garg A, Montague P. Interventions for helping patients to follow prescriptions for medications. In: The Cochrane Collaboration, editor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2002. p. CD000011. Available from: https://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD000011.

4. Psychological factors in end-stage renal disease: An emerging context for behavioral medicine research;Christensen AJ;J Consult Clin Psychol,2002

5. Anti-vaccine decision-making and measles resurgence in the United States;Benecke O;Global Pediatr Health,2019

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3