Carbogen:  A Safe and Effective Method for Apnea Testing to Declare Brain Death

Author:

Madden Maria1ORCID,Andrews Penny1,Day Jennifer2,Cho Sabrina2,Habashi Nader1

Affiliation:

1. R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center

2. University of Maryland Medical Center

Abstract

Abstract Objective In addition to a clinical exam, apnea testing is critical for confirmation of cessation of neurologic function [brain death]. However, traditional apnea exams place clinicians in a difficult position where maintaining oxygenation and hemodynamic stability in patients who are typically unstable have been associated with adverse events such as hypoxia, hypotension, pneumothorax, arrhythmias, derecruitment, and even cardiac death. The purpose of this retrospective case series was to assess whether apnea testing using carbogen was a safe, reliable alternative. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted of brain death exams and apnea tests performed for brain death determination in a university hospital and trauma center. Apnea tests were completed either using the “Traditional Method” (TM) by removing the patient from the ventilator and assessed for presence of spontaneous breathing by movement of the chest wall or the “Carbogen Method” (CM) where patients remain on the ventilator with two machine breaths per minute to deliver carbogen gas mixture and waveform graphics in addition to the patient’s chest wall were assessed for presence of spontaneous breathing. An arterial blood gas was used with both methods to determine if the necessary rise in PaCO2 occurred. However, with the CM, a formula is used to determine the necessary target PaCO2 level to be reached for completion of the apnea test rather than the clinician deciding when to draw the blood gas. Results Apnea tests were performed on 205 patients, n = 159 using CM and n = 46 using TM. Adverse events during and immediately after the exam were significantly less (p = .000) using CM than with TM. Although there was no statistically significant difference in the duration of the apnea test comparing the CM and TM, the test duration was significantly less in the Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV) group versus other modes when using the CM. Patients in the CM group had a significantly higher vasopressor dependency index than the TM group (p = .004). Conclusion These data suggest the Carbogen Method is safe, efficient, and an alternative solution to the traditional method of apnea testing to confirm cessation of neurologic function [brain death] resulting in fewer adverse events.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3