Affiliation:
1. Drexel University
2. ZERO – The End of Prostate Cancer
3. The Pennsylvania State University
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Measures of financial hardship have been suggested to supplement traditional measures of socioeconomic status (SES) to elucidate household economic well-being. This study formally tested the construct validity of the financial hardship construct and examined its association with markers of inflammation.
Methods
This study utilized data from 863 respondents from the Midlife Development in the United States Refresher Study (MIDUS-R) who completed the biomarker assessment (ages 25–76, mean age = 50.8; 52% female; 69% non-Hispanic white). Analysis for this study was divided into three steps. First, using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), we examined if the three-domain factor (material, psychological, and behavioral) is the best fitting model for financial hardship measures. Second, we conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the second-order measurement model of financial hardship with a three-factor first-order domain (material, psychological, and behavioral). Finally, we tested the association between the latent factor of financial hardship and interleukin 6 (IL6), c-reactive protein (CRP), and fibrinogen.
Results
Results from EFA supported the three-domain model of financial hardship. The hypothesized second-order measurement model for the three-domain model of financial hardship met the overall goodness-of-fit criteria (χ2 = 35.50, df = 11, RMSEA = 0.05; CFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.98; SRMR = 0.02). Finally, higher financial hardship was significantly associated with IL6 and fibrinogen but not CRP.
Conclusion
Explicating the socioeconomic environment to include indicators of financial hardship can help researchers better understand the pathway between SES and the inflammation process, which may help elucidate pathways between SES and age-related chronic diseases associated with inflammation.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Socioeconomic factors, health behaviors, and mortality: results from a nationally representative prospective study of US adults;Lantz PM;JAMA,1998
2. Palmer RC, Ismond D, Rodriquez EJ, Kaufman JS: Social determinants of health: future directions for health disparities research. In., vol. 109: American Public Health Association; 2019: S70-S71.
3. Association of inflammatory markers with socioeconomic status;Koster A;The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences,2006
4. Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic differentials of C-reactive protein levels: a systematic review of population-based studies;Nazmi A;BMC Public Health,2007
5. Socioeconomic position, race/ethnicity, and inflammation in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis;Ranjit N;Circulation,2007