Design and validation of an instrument to evaluate Person-Centered Care in Health Services.

Author:

Lehmann-Mendoza Rodolfo1,Sarabia-González Odet2,Figuerola-Escoto Rosa Paola3,Luna David4,Cortés-Moreno Gabriela Yanet5,González-Mundo Ilicia5,Caselín-Ledezma Rubén6,Vázquez-Dávila Roberto Arturo7,Martínez-Arredondo Hilario Ascención2

Affiliation:

1. Subdirección de Servicios de Salud, Petróleos Mexicanos

2. Gerencia de Medicina Preventiva, Petróleos Mexicanos

3. Instituto Politécnico Nacional

4. Comisión Nacional de Arbitraje Médico

5. Coordinación Nacional de Investigación, Petróleos Mexicanos

6. Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla

7. Subgerencia de Educación y Desarrollo en Salud, Petróleos Mexicanos

Abstract

Abstract Background The concept of quality in health care has evolved, placing greater importance on the patient's needs, culture, and social context, as well as their participation in clinical decision-making, as highlighted by Mead and Bower's Person-Centered Care Model. The aim of the present study was to design and validate an instrument to assess the extent to which healthcare services provided by PEMEX (Petróleos Mexicanos) offer person-centered care according to user perceptions. Methods The first phase comprised the development of 57 items based on the analysis of responses from an open-ended questionnaire administered to 30 users of Pemex healthcare services. This questionnaire was designed considering the four factors of the person-centered care model. Subsequently, a validation process was performed, including a sample of 330 individuals, with an exploratory factorial analysis to identify the initial instrument structure. Afterward, a confirmatory factorial analysis was carried out with 335 participants. Finally, a new confirmatory factorial analysis included 130 participants due to the refinements made in the previous phase. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω at every phase. Results The exploratory factor analysis retained 35 items in a single factor that accounted for 49% of the variance with an internal consistency of Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω = 0.97. Because the factorial structure by confirmatory factorial analysis was unsatisfactory, the initial model was refined, leading to the retention of 11 items with an internal consistency of Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω = 0.93. Due to the refinements, a new confirmatory factorial analysis was conducted with suitable goodness-of-fit criteria in most items, resulting in a Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω = 0.98. Conclusions The instrument exhibits suitable psychometric properties to be employed to measure the degree to which medical care is patient centered. The use of this instrument represents a strategy for the promotion of an innovative healthcare model.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3