Objective assessment of intraoperative skills for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN)

Author:

Farinha Rui1,Breda Alberto2,Porter James3,Mottrie Alexandre1,Cleynenbreugel Ben4,Sloten Jozef Vander5,Mottaran Angelo6,Gallagher Anthony1

Affiliation:

1. Orsi Academy

2. Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona

3. Swedish Medical Center

4. University Hospitals Leuven

5. KU Leuven

6. IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaris di Bologna

Abstract

Abstract Background RAPN training usually takes place in-vivo and methods vary across countries/ institutions. No common system exists to objectively assess trainee capacity to perform RAPN at predetermined performance levels prior to in-vivo practice. The identification of objective performance metrics for RAPN training is a crucial starting point to improve training and surgical outcomes. Objective The authors sought to examine the reliability, construct and discriminative validity of objective intraoperative performance metrics which best characterize optimal and suboptimal performance of a reference approach for training novice RAPN surgeons. Design, setting, and participants: Seven Novice and 9 Experienced RAPN surgeons videorecorded one or two independently performed RAPN procedures in the human. The videos were anonymized and two experienced urology surgeons were trained to reliably score RAPN performance, using previously developed metrics. The assessors were blinded to the performing surgeon, hospital and surgeon group. They independently scored surgeon RAPN performance. Novice and Experienced group performance scores were compared for procedure steps completed and errors made. Each group was divided at the median for Total Errors score, and subgroup scores (i.e., Novice HiErrs and LoErrs, Experienced HiErrs and LoErrs) were compared. Results The mean inter-rater reliability (IRR) for scoring was 0.95 (range 0.84–1). Compared with Novices, Experienced RAPN surgeons made 69% fewer procedural Total Errors. This difference was accentuated when LoErr Expert RAPN surgeon’s performance was compared with the HiErrs Novice RAPN surgeon’s performance with an observed 170% fewer Total Errors. GEARS showed poor reliability (Mean IRR = 0.44; range 0.0–0.8), for scoring RAPN surgical performance. Conclusions The RAPN procedure metrics reliably distinguish Novice and Experienced surgeon performances. They further differentiated performance levels within a group with similar experience. Reliable and valid metrics will underpin quality-assured novice RAPN surgical training.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference44 articles.

1. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update;Ljungberg B;Eur Urol,2015

2. Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy;Thompson RH;J Urol,2008

3. Survival advantage of partial over radical nephrectomy in patients presenting with localized renal cell carcinoma;Roos FC;BMC Cancer,2014

4. Alan W. Partin, David Hall McConnell, Craig A. Peters AJW. Campbell Walsh Wein Urology. 2020.

5. Joseph A. Smith Jr. MD, Stuart S. Howards MD GMPM. Hinman’s Atlas of Urologic Surgery. 4th ed. Saunders; 2019.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3