Affiliation:
1. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
2. Fitness Formula Clubs
3. Northwestern Medicine: Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Corp
Abstract
Abstract
Background Intensive lifestyle interventions (ILI) improve weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors, but health systems face challenges implementing them. We engaged stakeholders to cocreate and evaluate feasibility of primary care implementation strategies and of a pragmatic randomization procedure to be used for a future effectiveness trial.Methods The study setting was a single, urban primary care office. Patients with BMI ≥ 27 and ≥ 1 cardiovascular risk factor were sent a single electronic health record (EHR) message between December 2019 and January 2020 offering services to support an initial weight loss goal of about “10 pounds in 10 weeks.” All patients who affirmed weight loss interest were pragmatically enrolled in the trial and offered “Basic Lifestyle Services” (BLS), including a scale that transmits weight data to the EHR using cellular networks, a coupon to enroll in lifestyle coaching resources through a partnering fitness organization, and periodic EHR messages encouraging use of these resources. About half (n = 42) of participants were randomized by an automated EHR algorithm to also receive “Customized Lifestyle Services” (CLS), including weekly email messages adapted to individual weight loss progress and telephonic coaching by a nurse for those facing challenges. Interventions and assessments spanned January to July 2020, with interference by the coronavirus pandemic. Weight measures were collected from administrative sources. Qualitative analysis of stakeholder recommendations and patient interviews assessed acceptability, appropriateness, and sustainability of intervention components.Results Over 6 weeks, 426 patients were sent the EHR invitation message and 80 (18.8%) affirmed interest in the weight loss goal and were included for analysis. EHR data were available to ascertain a 6-month weight value for 77 (96%) patients. Overall, 62% of participants lost weight; 15.0% exhibited weight loss ≥ 5%, with no statistically significant difference between CLS or BLS arms (p = 0.85). CLS assignment increased participation in daily self-weighing (43% versus 21% of patients through 12 weeks) and enrollment in referral-based lifestyle support resources (52% versus 37%).Conclusions This preliminary study demonstrates feasibility of implementation strategies for primary care offices to offer and coordinate ILI core components, as well as a pragmatic randomization procedure for use in a future randomized comparative trial.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Behavioral and Pharmacotherapy Weight Loss Interventions to Prevent Obesity-Related Morbidity and Mortality in Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force;LeBlanc ES;JAMA,2018
2. O'Connor EA, Evans CV, Rushkin MC, Redmond N, Lin JS. Behavioral counseling interventions to promote a healthy diet and physical activity for cardiovascular disease prevention in adults with cardiovascular risk factors: updated systematic review for the U.S. preventive services task force. In: Evidence synthesis. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2020. Available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565468.
3. Impact of intensive lifestyle and metformin therapy on cardiovascular disease risk factors in the diabetes prevention program;Ratner R;Diabetes Care,2005
4. Reduction in weight and cardiovascular disease risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes: one-year results of the Look AHEAD trial;Look AHEADR;Diabetes Care,2007
5. Effect of weight loss with lifestyle intervention on risk of diabetes;Hamman RF;Diabetes Care,2006