To bury or not to bury the k-wires after fixation of a pediatric both bone forearm fracture, a randomized controlled trial

Author:

Khaled Mohamed1,Fadle Amr A1,Hassan Ahmed Abdelazim1,Khalifa Ahmed2,Nabil Andrew1,Hafez Abdelkhaleak1,Oyoun Nariman Abol Abol1

Affiliation:

1. Assiut University Hospitals

2. South Valley University

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The primary objective was to compare refracture incidence of both radius and ulna fracture in two groups treated using intramedullary k-wires where the wires were buried in group I and left exposed in group II. The secondary objective was to compare the final functional outcomes and complications incidence. Methods Between March 2019 and February 2021, 60 pediatric patients presented with unstable radius and ulna fractures amenable to surgical intervention using intramedullary K-wires were randomized into Group I (k-wires were buried under the skin) or group II (k-wires were exposed above the skin by 2 cm). In group I, k-wires were removed after full union under general anesthesia as a day case procedure; in group II they were removed in the outpatient clinic. Functional outcome per Price criteria was reported at one-year follow-up. Results Included patients had a mean age of 7.6 years (range 5 to 10). The mean operative time was significantly higher in group I (32.33 ± 7.51 vs. 36.77 ± 8.70 minutes, P = 0.03), no difference regarding intraoperative x-ray exposure (43.12 ± 15.52 vs. 41.6 ± 11.96 seconds, P = 0.67). Fracture union was achieved after a mean of 44 ± 2.6 days in group I and 43 ± 1.87 days in group II. One patient had refracture, and two had deep infection necessitated surgical debridement in group I. All patients reported excellent scores per Price criteria and achieved full wrist and elbow ROM compared to the contralateral non-injured side. Conclusion Exposed implants are a safe option when dealing with pediatric forearm fractures with similar complications rate and functional outcomes compared to buried implants; however, it confers fewer hospital admissions.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3