How frail is frail in oncology studies? A scoping review

Abstract

Abstract Aims:The frailty index (FI) is one way in which frailty can be quantified. While it is measured as a continuous variable, various cut-off points have been used to categorise older adults as frail or non-frail, and these have largely been validated in the acute care or community settings for older adults without cancer. This study aimed to explore which FI categories have been applied to older adults with cancer and to determine why these categories were selected by study authors.Methods:This scoping review searched Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for studies which measured and categorised an FI in adults with cancer. Of the 1165 screened, 40 were eligible for inclusion. Data including oncological setting, FI categories, and the references or rationale for categorisation were extract and analysed.Results:The FI score used to categorise participants as frail ranged from 0.06 to 0.35, with 0.35 being the most frequently used, followed by 0.25 and 0.20. The rationale for FI categories was provided in most studies but was not always relevant. Three of the included studies using an FI > 0.35 to define frailty were frequently referenced as the rationale for subsequent studies, however the original rationale for this categorisation was unclear. Few studies sought to determine or validate optimum FI categorises in this population.Conclusion:There is significant variability in how studies have categorised the FI in older adults with cancer. An FI ≥ 0.35 to categorise frailty was used most frequently, however an FI in this range has often represented at least moderate to severe frailty in other studies. These findings contrast with a scoping review of highly cited studies categorising FI in older adults without cancer, where an FI ≥ 0.25 was most common. Maintaining the FI as a continuous variable is likely to be beneficial until further validation studies determine optimum FI categories in this population. Disparities in how the FI has been categorised, and indeed how older adults have been labelled as ‘frail’, limits our ability to synthesise results and to understand the impact of frailty in cancer care.