There is No Difference Between Two and Five Minutes of Static Stretching on Gastrocnemius Medialis Muscle Architecture

Author:

Friderichs William1,Sonda Francesca Chaida2,Cini Anelize2,Fraporti Gabriela2,Vaz Marco Aurélio2,Lima Claúdia Silveira2

Affiliation:

1. Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos

2. Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Abstract

Abstract Background Skeletal muscle’s architecture can undergo temporary or permanent adaptations when subjected to chronic passive loading, such as during passive static stretching (PSS). Aims We evaluated the effects of a 6-week PSS program, with two and five minutes of duration, on the Gastrocnemius Medialis (GM’s) muscle architecture parameters. The second aim of this study was to determine the inter-analyzer reliability of the GM’s muscle architecture images analysis process. Methods 30 healthy adults participated in this study. Plantar flexors’ PSS was applied three times a week for 6 weeks. Participants were divided into three groups: Control Group (CG), 2-minutes of PSS (G2) and 5-minutes of PSS (G5). They were assessed before, after, and two weeks post the intervention. GM’s muscle thickness (MT), pennation angle (PA) and fascicle length (FL) were measured with an ultrasound system by an experienced evaluator. All images were analyzed by two independent analyzers, using the Image-J software. Results No significant effects were identified (p > 0.05) of the PSS program on muscle architecture parameters. No architectural changes were observed following the detraining period. GM’s MT results presented excellent reliability, while good reliability was found for the FL measures. For PA, good reliability was just observed for the post-intervention moment. On the pre-intervention and follow-up moments, the intraclass correlation coefficients values were moderate. Conclusion A 6-week PSS program did not generate adaptations on GM’s muscle architecture parameters in healthy subjects, independent of the stretching duration. Muscle architecture parameters are reliable when analyzed by different analyzers. Registration Number: This study was registered in Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry RBR-5j3h3c on 07/24/2018 (http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/).

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3