Postoperative change in the joint-line convergence angle contributes to inaccurate correction in high tibial osteotomy

Abstract

Abstract Objective Accurate correction is a prerequisite for the favorable outcomes of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). However, previous studies have reported disappointing results regarding correction accuracy despite the use of intra-operative navigation, which implies that a certain factor other than bony components is involved in the inaccurate correction (mainly overcorrection). The joint-line convergence angle (JLCA) can represent soft tissue effects in OWHTO. This study tried to determine whether the postoperative change in the JLCA (∆JLCA) led to inaccurate correction. Methods Medical records of 78 OWHTO patients from 2005 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) was measured with a positive value indicating varus alignment. Inaccurate correction was defined as |postoperative HKA| >3°. The JLCA was measured before and 6 months after surgery on long-standing hip-to-ankle radiographs, and ∆JLCA was defined as the difference between the preoperative and 6-month postoperative JLCAs. ∆JLCA was compared between the accurate correction group and the inaccurate correction group, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to obtain the cutoff ∆JLCA at which the sensitivity and the specificity for inaccurate correction were maximized. Clinical outcomes were also compared between the groups using the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS). Results Of the 78 patients, inaccurate correction was noted in 10 patients. The overall preoperative and postoperative HKAs were 7.0 ± 3.1° and − 0.4 ± 1.5°, respectively. The accurate correction group and the inaccurate correction group had a difference in ∆JLCA (p = 0.010). However, no significant difference was found in the preoperative HKA (p = 0.529). An ROC curve showed that the cutoff ∆JLCA was 1.9°. In the patients having ∆JLCA ≥ 1.9°, the mean JLCA was 4.9 ± 1.6° preoperatively and 1.7 ± 1.2° postoperatively. In the other patients having ∆JLCA < 1.9°, the mean preoperative and postoperative JLCA were 2.5 ± 1.8° and 2.3 ± 1.8°, respectively. The difference in the preoperative JLCA was significant (p < 0.001). The postoperative KOOS subscales did not differ according to correction accuracy. Conclusion Inaccurate correction in OWHTO, specifically valgus overcorrection, is attributable to ∆JLCA which represents the postoperative change of soft tissue effects. Overcorrection should be checked in cases of large preoperative JLCAs.