Process evaluation of a tailored nudge intervention to promote appropriate care and treatment of older patients at the end-of-life

Author:

Bracci Ella L.1,Barnett Adrian G.2,Brown Christine2,Callaway Leonie3,Cardona Magnolia4,Carter Hannah E.2,Graves Nicholas2,Hillman Kenneth5,Lee Xing J.2,McPhail Steven M.2,White Ben P.2,Willmott Lindy2,Harvey Gillian1

Affiliation:

1. Flinders University

2. Queensland University of Technology

3. Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

4. Bond University

5. UNSW Sydney

Abstract

Abstract Background Non-beneficial treatment affects a considerable proportion of older people in hospital, and some will choose to decline invasive treatments when they are approaching the end of their life. The Intervention for Appropriate Care and Treatment (InterACT) study was a 12-month stepped wedge randomised controlled trial with an embedded process evaluation in three hospitals in Brisbane, Australia. The aim was to increase appropriate care and treatment decisions for older people at the end-of-life, through implementing a nudge intervention in the form of a prospective feedback loop. However, the trial results indicated that the expected practice change did not occur. The process evaluation aimed to assess implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, identify barriers and enablers to implementation and provide insights into the lack of effect of the InterACT intervention.Methods Qualitative data collection involved 38 semi-structured interviews with participating clinicians, members of the executive advisory groups overseeing the study at site level, clinical auditors, and project leads. Online interviews were conducted at two times: implementation onset and completion. Data were coded to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and deductively analysed.Results Overall, clinicians felt the premise and clinical reasoning behind InterACT were strong and could improve patient management. However, several prominent barriers affected implementation. These related to the potency of the nudge intervention and its integration into routine clinical practice, clinician beliefs and perceived self-efficacy, and wider contextual factors at the health system level.Conclusions An intervention designed to change clinical practice for patients at or near to end-of-life did not have the intended effect. Future interventions targeting this area of care should consider using multi-component strategies that address the identified barriers to implementation and clinician change of practice.Trial Registration Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ANZCTR), ACTRN12619000675123p (approved 6 May 2019).

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference25 articles.

1. Clinicians' Perceptions of Futile or Potentially Inappropriate Care and Associations with Avoidant Behaviors and Burnout;Chamberlin P;J Palliat Med,2019

2. Non-beneficial treatments in hospital at the end of life: a systematic review on extent of the problem;Cardona-Morrell M;Int J Qual Health Care,2016

3. White BP, Willmott L, Close E, Futile. Non-beneficial, Potentially Inappropriate or ‘Disputed’ Treatment. Philosophy and Medicine. 1362020. p. 181 – 98.

4. What does “futility” mean? An empirical study of doctors' perceptions;White B;Med J Aust,2016

5. Reasons doctors provide futile treatment at the end of life: a qualitative study;Willmott L;J Med Ethics,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3