The Validation of Non-Invasive Pressure-Volume Loop Indices in Severe Aortic Stenosis

Author:

Aldalati Omar1,Eskandari Mehdi2,Ali Montasir H1,Cabaco Rita2,Byrne Jonathan2,Monaghan Mark2,Lukban Bobit2,Kennedy Nicola2,Shah Ajay2,Dworakowski Rafal2,MacCarthy Philip2

Affiliation:

1. University Hospital of Wales

2. King’s College Hospital

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Studies utilising invasive pressure‒volume loops offer valuable insights into left ventricular (LV) contractility, yet their availability remains limited. Conversely, noninvasive indices are accessible and reproducible; however, their validation in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) is lacking. We sought to validate the noninvasive indices of PVL studies in a group of symptomatic severe AS patients. We recruited patients with symptomatic severe AS admitted for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for invasive PVL studies. Noninvasive PVL indices were measured with three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography with a prespecified protocol. The agreement between invasive and noninvasive calculation methods was assessed. Results: Eleven patients (11) were recruited for this pilot study. The noninvasive end-systolic pressure‒volume relationship (ESPVR) determined by Kelly's method (Ees(sb) = 0.9 × systolic blood pressure/end-systolic volume (ESV)) had the best agreement with the invasive ESPVR (limits of agreement -1.7 to 2.1 with a percentage error of 24%, one sample T test p =0.504). Systolic blood pressure, as measured by the brachial blood pressure cuff, had the best agreement with end-systolic pressure in severe aortic stenosis (limits of agreement -60 to 60 with a percentage error of 3%, one sample T test p =0.959). Conclusion: Measurement of the single-beat estimate of ventricular elastance (Ees(sb)) is possible in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Kelly's method (Ees(sb) = 0.9 × SBP/ESV) had the best agreement with the invasive measurement of left ventricular elastance (Ees). Systolic blood pressure, as measured by the brachial blood pressure cuff, has the best agreement with end-systolic pressure in severe aortic stenosis.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference23 articles.

1. Severe aortic stenosis with high valvulo-arterial impedance (Zva) has more adverse cardiac changes on cardiovascular magnetic resonance;Lam W;J Cardiovasc Magn Reson,2016

2. Pibarot P, Garcia D, Dumesnil JG. Energy loss index in aortic stenosis: from fluid mechanics concept to clinical application. Circulation [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2019 Dec 21];127:1101–4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23479666.

3. Validation of Noninvasive Measures of Left Ventricular Mechanics in Children: A Simultaneous Echocardiographic and Conductance Catheterisation Study;Chowdhury SM;J Am Soc Echocardiogr,2016

4. Chasing the Elusive Pressure–Volume Relationships⁎⁎Editorials published in JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging or the American College of Cardiology;Burkhoff D;JACC Cardiovasc Imaging,2009

5. Shishido T, Hayashi K, Shigemi K, Sato T, Sugimachi M, Sunagawa K. Single-beat estimation of end-systolic elastance using bilinearly approximated time-varying elastance curve. Circulation [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2019 Dec 21];102:1983–9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11034949.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3