Abstract
Abstract
Many theoretical models of action research depict its process as cycles comprising several sequential phases. In Bhutan, teachers use Kemmis and McTaggart’s spiral model which has four phases of plan, act, observe and reflect to conduct action research for their professional learning. As a growing practice, the way Bhutanese teachers carry out action research is an emerging field of inquiry. This study explored how three Bhutanese secondary science teachers in a case study school conducted their first action research project using Kemmis and McTaggart’s model to improve student interaction in the class. Data were collected using diaries, interviews and observations and analysed using three-step coding procedures of grounded theory. The findings showed that the science teachers conducted multiple iterations by moving back-and-forth between the four phases of Kemmis and McTaggart’s model. It demonstrated a messy and non-linear process of action research conducted through continuous reflection which was inconsistent with the neat cycles of Kemmis and McTaggart’s model. Despite a few challenges, the multiple iterations and continuous reflection helped the teachers to make progress in their action research and develop an interactive teaching strategy. Given the absence of multiple iterations and messiness in the action research knowledge disseminated to teachers in Bhutan, the study highlights the requirement for the Ministry of Education and teachers to consider mess and multiple iterations as a normal process of action research.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. Antle JB. Collocations and action research: learning vocabulary through collocations. London: Bloomsbury Academic; 2018.
2. Conducting action research in Indonesia: illustrations and implications;Burns A;Indones J Lang Teach,2022
3. Calhoun EF. How to use action research in the self-renewing school. Association of supervision and curriculum development. Alexandria, Virginia; 1994.
4. Promoting quality for teacher action research: lessons learned from science teachers’ action research;Capobianco BM;Educ Action Res,2006
5. The importance of mess in action research;Cook T;Educ Action Res,1998