Exploring learner profiles among low-educated adults in second-chance education: individual differences in quantity and quality of learning motivation and learning strategies used

Author:

Mertens Bea1ORCID,De Maeyer Sven2,Donche Vincent2

Affiliation:

1. University of Antwerp: Universiteit Antwerpen

2. University of Antwerp - City campus: Universiteit Antwerpen

Abstract

Abstract Research on learning strategies and learning motivation in different educational contexts has provided valuable insights, but in this field, low-educated adults remain an understudied population. This study addresses this gap by means of a person-oriented approach and seeks to investigate whether quantitatively and qualitatively different learner profiles can be distinguished among low-educated adults in second-chance education (SCE) by relating three key components of learning: learning motivation, regulation and processing strategies. 512 adult learners of six SCE-institutions filled in a Learning and Motivation questionnaire. Latent profile analysis shows the presence of motivational profiles differing both in quantity and quality (i.e., good- versus poor-quality and high- versus low-quantity motivational profiles) and regulatory profiles being distinct in the use of regulation strategies (i.e., self-regulated versus unregulated profiles). Mainly quantitatively different processing profiles were found among low-educated adults (i.e., active, moderate, inactive processing profiles). When integrating all three components of learning, analyses identified two more optimal motivational-learning profiles, combining good-quality motivation with a moderately-active use of self-regulation and processing strategies (i.e., good-quality motivation – self-regulated – active processing profile and good-quality motivation – moderate profile) and two more suboptimal profiles in which poor-quality or low-quantity motivation is combined with the inactive use of self-regulation and processing strategies (i.e., poor-quality motivation – unregulated – inactive processing profile, low-quantity motivation – unregulated – inactive processing profile). A fifth motivational-learning profile exhibits a pattern of poor-quality motivation combined with a moderately-active use of self- regulation and processing strategies.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference128 articles.

1. Akogul, S., & Erisoglu, M. (2017).An Approach for Determining the Number of clusters in a Model-

2. Based Cluster Analysis.Entropy, 19(9),452. https://doi.org/10.3390/e19090452

3. Alexander, P. A. (2017). Issues of Constructs. Contexts, and Continuity: Commentary on Learning in.

4. Higher Education.Educational Psychology Review, 29(2),345–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9409-3

5. The person and the variable in developmental psychology;Bergman LR;Journal of Psychology,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3