Perinatal outcome of crash caesarean section under neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia: a seven-year retrospective analysis

Author:

Shi Xueduo1,Xu Chenyang,Wen Yazhou,Jiang Ming,Yu Huiling,Wang Xian,Yuan Hongmei,Feng ShanwuORCID

Affiliation:

1. Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University: Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Objective The crash cesarean section (CS), which keeps extremely life-threatening to maternals or fetus, seems to be performed within adequate time horizon for the avoidance of negative feto-maternal denouement. The effective and vigilant technique of anesthesia remains vital for crash cesarean delivery. This study, hence, aims to validate the impact of various anesthesia tactics on the maternal as well as neonatal outcomes. Method This was a retrospective cohort study of parturient with the indication for crash CS with the assistance of general or neuraxial anesthesia during the period of January 2015 and July 2021 in our institution. The 1min Apgar score as primary outcome was documented. Secondary outcomes composing 5 min Apgar score, DDI, OAII, duration of operation, length of hospitalization, height and weight of newborn, use of vasopressors, blood loss were also measured. Results Of the total 536 subjects incorporated in the analysis, 337 crash CS were performed under general anesthesia (GA), 137 under epidural anesthesia (EA) and 65 under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSE), respectively. The Apgar score of 1 min and 5 min in newborn receiving general anesthesia were lower than those under intraspinal anesthesia and no difference was found between EA and CSEA. The decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) of parturients under GA, EA, and CSE was 7[6,7], 6[6,7], and 14[11.5,20.5], respectively. DDI as well as decision to incision interval (DII) of GA and EA were shorter than CES, among which there was a similarity in DDI and DII between GA and EA. Compared to GA, the onset of anesthesia to incision interval (OAII) of intraspinal anesthesia was extended significantly. The birth height and weight of neonates from EA seem to be superior to GA. Conclusion Epidural anesthesia did not exploited negative impact on neonatal and maternal outcomes as compared to general anesthesia and could be utilized as an alternative to general anesthesia in crash cesarean section; in addition, the DDI of crash cesarean section could be achieved within 15 minutes under general or epidural anesthesia in our institution.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference21 articles.

1. Flentje Markus E, Hendrik M et al (2020) Transfer of an interprofessional emergency caesarean section training program: using questionnaire combined with outcome data of newborn. [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 302: 585–593

2. Effect of anaesthetic technique on neonatal morbidity in emergency caesarean section for foetal distress;Saadet EI;[J] PLoS One,2018

3. Maternal and neonatal outcome after cesarean section: the impact of anesthesia.[;Gori F;J] J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2007

4. MBRRACE-UK: saving lives, improving mothers’ care -implications for anaesthetists;Freedman RL;Int J Obstet Anesth,2015

5. A retrospective review of 10-year trends in general anesthesia for cesarean delivery at a university hospital: the impact of a newly launched team on obstetric anesthesia practice. n[J];Ikeda Takamitsu K;BMC Health Serv Res,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3