Author:
Heine Martin,Martens Monika,Boateng Daniel,Ku Grace Marie,Remmen Roy,Wouters Edwin,Chhim Srean,Susič Antonjia Poplas,Damme Wim van,Olmen Josefien van,Klipstein-Grobusch Kerstin,consortium on behalf of the SCUBY
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
The SCUBY project aimed to provide knowledge on the scaling-up of an Integrated Care Package (ICP) for type 2 diabetes and hypertension across three distinct health systems (Cambodia, Slovenia, and Belgium). Here, we analyse the different elements of the country-specific scale-up roadmaps to identify similarities and differences, and share lessons learned.
Methods
Thematic analysis was used to derive crucial roadmap elements from key SCUBY documents (n = 20), including policy briefs, interim reports, research outputs, and consortium meeting notes.
Results
Roadmap elements differed according to priority needs, features of the (health) systems, and partly reflected the position of the SCUBY research team within each country. Common cross-country elements were: task-shifting to patients themselves, nurses and community health workers; strengthening monitoring and evaluation; and creating an enabling environment for ICP implementation.
Discussion
Scale-up of complex interventions requires continuous engagement of multiple stakeholders and contextualization of action plans. The linkage of research teams with key implementation stakeholders and policy makers creates change-teams, allowing advancement from formative research to implementation of roadmap strategies and full scale-up in due time.
Conclusion
The development processes and contents of the roadmaps provided essential and reciprocal learnings. These help shape future policy dialogues and best practices to tackle chronic disease in each participating country.
Funder
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016;Abajobir AA;The Lancet,2017
2. Systematic literature review on effectiveness of self-management support interventions in patients with chronic conditions and low socio-economic status;Hecke A;Journal of advanced nursing,2017
3. Diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease: clinical insights and vascular mechanisms;Petrie JR;Canadian Journal of Cardiology,2018
4. GBD Results Tool | GHDx [Internet]. [cited 2018 Jul 5]. Available from: http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool
5. Scale-up integrated care for diabetes and hypertension in Cambodia, Slovenia and Belgium (SCUBY): a study design for a quasi-experimental multiple case study;Olmen J;Glob Health Action.,2020