The Impact of Utilizing Electronic Information Databases on Evidence-Based Practice Among Iranian Pharmacists: A Simulated-Based Survey.

Author:

Pourbala Hooman1,Mohammadnezhad Ghader1,Esmaily Hadi1

Affiliation:

1. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Abstract Background: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) involves the conscious and careful utilization of the most reliable evidence available when making decisions regarding patient care. EBM can improve treatment plan success, patient compliance, rational use of medications, and healthcare costs. Objectives: This study evaluated the knowledge, attitude, and practice of pharmacists regarding EBM utilization in community pharmacies. Methods: A short questionnaire designed and validated to assess the knowledge and attitudes of community pharmacists. A simulated-patient method (SPM) was used to evaluate the practice one week after completing the questionnaire. Results and Discussion: Within 284 pharmacy visits, the results of 200 pharmacists were collected entirely. The average knowledge score was 37.91 ± 15.4 out of 100. The pharmacists aged 24-29 demonstrated higher knowledge levels than older pharmacists (P=0.042). Furthermore, those who consult more than 30 prescriptions daily showcased a higher knowledge level (P=0.024). Additionally, it was found that pharmacists who utilized the UpToDate® clinical resource exhibited greater knowledge and practice in comparison to others (P<0.001). Most pharmacists had a positive attitude towards EBM and its implementation in the pharmacy (99.5%). The mean score of practice was 50.34 ± 21.35. A direct association was detected between knowledge and practice (r=0.73, P=0.023). There was no association between pharmacists' attitudes and their practice scores. Conclusion: Most pharmacists agreed about the crucial need to incorporate EBM into pharmacy practices. Pharmacists with advanced knowledge of EBM and using UpToDate® showed better knowledge and practice. Registration code: https://ethics.research.ac.ir/EthicsProposalView.php?id=152834

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3