Affiliation:
1. Sun Yat-sen University
2. Guangzhou Medical University
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) in anti-retroviral therapy (ART) have been recommended by the World Health Organization for their higher efficacy, favorable safety and tolerability. However, the clinical evidence supporting switching to INSTI-containing regimes in low-and-middle-income countries is limited, as few patients have access to these regimes. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of INSTI-containing regimens in real-world settings in China compared to government-provided free ART.
Method
We compared the short-term and long-term effectiveness between INSTI-containing regimens and free ART drugs provided by the Chinese government in four dimensions: viral suppression status, immune response, liver and kidney function, and AIDS-related diseases. To control baseline confounders, we used propensity score matching, calculated using logistic regression including sociodemographic and baseline factors.
Results
Among 12,836 patients initiating ART from 2012 to 2019, 673 (5.2%) used INSTI-containing regimens.
Compared with patients initiating ART with free drugs, patients initiating ART with INSTI-containing regimens were more likely to be older (43.26±14.87 vs. 36.43±12.19; p<0.001), not single (66.6% vs. 51.0%; p<0.001), infected with HIV through sexual behavior with an opposite-sex partner (50.7% vs. 42.2%; p<0.001), had a lower baseline CD4 cell count (50 cells/μL vs. 239 cells/μL; p<0.001), present more AIDS-related diseases and abnormal results of liver and kidney function, and had more TB infection.
For short-term effectiveness, patients initiating INSTI-containing regimens were more likely to achieve viral suppression (81.4% vs. 52.0%; p<0.001). The differences in immune response, liver and kidney function and AIDS-related diseases were not significant between the two groups. For long-term effectiveness, viral suppression rates were similar (87.96% vs. 84.59%; p=0.135), with no significant differences in immune response, liver and kidney function, or AIDS-related diseases.
Conclusions
Our study suggests that patients initiating ART with INSTI-containing regimens have worse physical status at baseline than patients starting with free ART drugs. Furthermore, we found better virological performances of INSTI-containing regimens in the short-term but not in the long-term due to a high rate of drug changes. Our findings have clinical implications and provide new evidence regarding the effectiveness of INSTI-containing regimes in LMICs.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Updated recommendations on first-line and second-line antiretroviral regimens and post-exposure prophylaxis and recommendations on early infant diagnosis of HIV;World Health Organization,2018
2. Once-daily dolutegravir versus darunavir plus ritonavir in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection (FLAMINGO): 48 week results from the randomised open-label phase 3b study;Clotet B;Lancet,2014
3. Dolutegravir plus abacavir-lamivudine for the treatment of HIV-1 infection;Walmsley SL;N Engl J Med,2013
4. Dolutegravir versus efavirenz in women starting HIV therapy in late pregnancy (DolPHIN-2): an open-label, randomised controlled trial;Kintu K;The Lancet HIV,2020
5. Raltegravir versus Efavirenz regimens in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week efficacy, durability, subgroup, safety, and metabolic analyses;Lennox JL;J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr,2010