Usual Light Touch Osteopathic Treatment Versus Simple Light Touch Without Intent in the Reduction of Infantile Colic Crying Time: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Author:

Carnes Dawn1,Bright Philip2,Brownhill Kevin1,Carroll Karen3,Engel Roger4,Grace Sandra5,Vogel Steven1,Vaucher Paul6

Affiliation:

1. University College of Osteopathy

2. European School of Osteopathy

3. Sutherland Cranial College of Osteopathy

4. Macquarie University

5. Southern Cross University

6. HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract Background: In many countries, it is common for parents to seek osteopathic care for their infants with colic. The aim of this study was to measure the effectiveness of usual light touch osteopathic treatment on crying time for infants with ‘colic’. Methods: Between September 2019 and July 2021, a superiority, two arm, single blinded (parent) multi-centre, randomised controlled trial, recruited healthy infants between 1 – 69 days of age who excessively cried, fussed, or were distressed and difficult to console. They were recruited by 22 private practice osteopaths in the UK, Australia and Switzerland. Infants were randomly allocated on a 1:1 ratio to either the Test or Control group. The Test intervention consisted of usual light touch osteopathic treatment, whereas the Control intervention consisted of simple light touch to random body locations with no treatment intent. Both groups received best practice advice and guidance. The primary outcome was the daily crying time, reported hourly by parents in a diary, over a two-week period. Secondary outcomes were parenting confidence, global change, satisfaction, and experience of care. Results: Sixty-six infants were recruited, 32 were allocated to the Test group and 34 to the Control group. All participants received the treatment they were allocated to and blinding was successful. Mean average daily crying time was 124 minutes (SD=69, n=26) in the Test group and 115 minutes (SD=49, n=29) in the Control group. Adjusting for baseline crying time, infant age, prior expectations for osteopathic care, and days within trial, infants in the Test group cried 2.2 minutes more per day than those in the Control group (CI95% -20 to 25 minutes, p=0.849). Parents’ perceptions of global change in symptoms, satisfaction with, and experience of care were high and similar in both groups. There were no serious adverse events related to the treatments or the trial. Conclusion: Usual light touch osteopathictreatment was not superior to simple light touch without treatment intent. Both interventions had similar effects in reducing crying time in infants with colic. The biomechanical explanatory models and underpinning assumptions about the mechanisms at play during osteopathic light touch care require reconsideration. Trial registration: ACTRN12620000047998 (22/01/2020)

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3