Test-Retest Repeatability of Patlak Slopes versus Standardized Uptake Values for Hypermetabolic Lesions and Normal Organs in an Oncologic PET/CT Population

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: We aimed to determine the test-retest repeatability of quantitative metrics based on the Patlak slope (PS) versus the standardized uptake value (SUV) among lesions and normal organs on oncologic [18F]FDG-PET/CT. Procedures: This prospective, single-center study enrolled adults undergoing standard-of-care oncologic [18F]FDG-PET/CTs. Early (35-50 min post-injection) and late (75-90 min post-injection) SUV and PS images were reconstructed from dynamic whole-body PET data. Repeat imaging occurred within 7 days. Relevant quantitative metrics were extracted from lesions and normal organs. Repeatability was assessed via mean test-retest percent changes [T-RT %Δ], within-subject coefficients of variation (wCVs), and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: Nine subjects (mean age, 61.7 ± 6.2 years; 6 females) completed the test-retest protocol. Four subjects collectively had 17 [18F]FDG-avid lesions. Lesion wCVs were higher (i.e., worse repeatability) for PS-early-max (16.2%) and PS-early-peak (15.6%) than for SUV-early-max (8.9%) and SUV-early-peak (8.1%), with similar early metric ICCs (0.95-0.98). Lesion wCVs were similar for PS-late-max (8.5%) and PS-late-peak (6.4%) relative to SUV-late-max (9.7%) and SUV-late-peak (7.2%), with similar late metric ICCs (0.93-0.98). There was a significant bias toward higher retest SUV and PS values in the lesion analysis (T-RT %Δ [95% CI]: SUV-late-max, 10.0% [2.6%, 17.0%]; PS-late-max, 20.4% [14.3%, 26.4%]) but not in the normal organ analysis. Conclusion: Among [18F]FDG-avid lesions, the repeatability of PS-based metrics is similar to equivalent SUV-based metrics at late post-injection time points, making PS-based metrics suitable for tracking response to oncologic therapies. However, evaluation was somewhat limited by a bias toward higher retest values.