Assessing the Inter-rater Reliability of the Usability Model for Software Development Processes and Practices

Author:

Fontdevila Diego1,Genero Marcela2,Paez Nicolás1,Oliveros Alejandro1

Affiliation:

1. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero

2. University of Castilla-La Mancha

Abstract

Abstract Software processes and practices have a leading role in software development and in the last few decades a wide variety of processes and practices have emerged to face the challenges arising in the software industry. The success of process and practice adoption initiatives depends at least partially on the experience and satisfaction of the people who use them, thus making usability an interesting process quality attribute. This paper describes the inter-rater reliability evaluations performed on the UMP to assess consistency among metric values produced by different evaluators. It presents two inter-rater reliability assessment studies, the Scrum study and the TDD-BDD study. The paper presents four inter-rater reliability statistics for the process and practices under study, a comparative analysis of their strengths and weaknesses, and an analysis of the study results and their interpretation. The results show varying reliability results among the different UMP metrics, which seem to depend mostly on object of evaluation (Scrum, TDD, BDD), metric subjectivity and context sensitivity. The UMP was refined from the data gathered in the studies and a metric categorization is proposed to facilitate metric usage.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference47 articles.

1. Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall.

2. Ambler, S. (2009). Agile practices survey results. http://www.ambysoft.com/surveys/ practices2009.html.

3. Beck, K., & Andres, C. (2004). Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley Professional.

4. Communications Through Limited Response Questioning;Bennett EM;Public Opinion Quarterly,1954

5. Bias, prevalence and kappa;Byrt T;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,1993

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3