Affiliation:
1. University of Geneva Faculty of Medicine: Universite de Geneve Faculte de Medecine
2. Fondation Pôle Autisme, Geneva
3. Dalhousie Medical School: Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Imitation behaviors develop very early and increase in frequency and complexity during childhood. Most studies in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) support a general decrement in imitation performance. To better understand this phenomenon in ASD, factors related to visual attention and motor execution have been proposed. However, these studies used various paradigms and explored different types of imitation in heterogeneous samples, leading to inconsistent findings. The present study examines imitation performance related to visual attention and motor execution. We focused on gesture imitation, consistently reported as more affected than imitation of actions with objects in ASD. We also investigated the influence of meaningful and meaningless gestures on imitation performance.
Methods
Our imitation eye-tracking task used a video of an actor who demonstrated gestures and prompted children to imitate them. The demonstrations comprised three types of gestures: meaningful (MF) and meaningless (ML) hand gestures, and meaningless facial gestures. We measured the total fixation duration to the actor’ face during child-directed speech and gesture demonstrations. During the eye-tracking task, we video-recorded children to later assess their imitation performance. Our sample comprised 100 participants, among which were 84 children with ASD (aged 3.55 ± 1.11 years).
Results
Our results showed that the ASD and typically developing (TD) groups globally displayed the same visual attention toward the face (during child-directed speech) and toward gesture demonstrations, although children with ASD spent less time fixating on the face during FAC stimuli. Visual exploration of actors’ faces and gestures did not influence imitation performance. Rather, imitation performance was positively correlated with chronological and developmental age. Moreover, imitation of MF gestures was associated with less severe autistic symptoms, whereas imitation of ML gestures was positively correlated with higher non-verbal cognitive skills and fine motor skills.
Conclusions
These findings contribute to a better understanding of the complexity of imitation. We delineated the distinct nature of imitation of MF and ML hand gestures in children with ASD. We discuss clinical implications in relation to assessment and intervention programs.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. Imitation and the development of infant learning, memory, and categorisation;Jones EJH;Rev Primatol,2009
2. Vivanti G, Hamilton A. Imitation in Autism Spectrum Disorders. Handb. Autism Pervasive Dev. Disord. Diagn. Dev. Brain Mech., vol. 1. 4th edition, Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2014, p. 278–301.
3. Only Tongue Protrusion Modeling Is Matched by Neonates;Anisfeld M;Dev Rev,1996
4. Imitation in newborn infants: Exploring the range of gestures imitated and the underlying mechanisms;Meltzoff AN;Dev Psychol,1989
5. Positive evidence for neonatal imitation: A general response, adaptive engagement;Nagy E;Dev Sci,2020