Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial.

Author:

McMahon Amy1ORCID,Kaptoge Stephen1,Walker Matthew1,Mehenny Susan2,Gilchrist Philippe T3,Sambrook Jennifer4,Akhtar Naim2,Sweeting Michael5,Wood Angela M1,Stirrups Kathleen4,Chung Ryan1,Fahle Sarah1,Johnson Elisha1,Cullen Donna2,Godfrey Rosemary2,Duthie Shannon1,Allen Louise2,Harvey Paul1,Berkson Michael1,Allen Elizabeth1,Watkins Nicholas A6,Bradley John R4,Kingston Nathalie4,Miflin Gail2,Armitage Jane7,Roberts David J2,Danesh John1,Angelantonio Emanuele Di1

Affiliation:

1. University of Cambridge Department of Public Health and Primary Care

2. NHS Blood and Transplant

3. Macquarie University

4. NIHR BioResource

5. University of Leicester

6. UKHSA: UK Health Security Agency

7. University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Population Health

Abstract

Abstract Background: Vasovagal reactions (VVRs) are the most common acute complications of blood donation. Responsible for substantial morbidity, they also reduce the likelihood of repeated donations, and are disruptive and costly for blood services. Although blood establishments worldwide have adopted different strategies to prevent VVRs (including water loading and applied muscle tension [AMT]), robust evidence is limited. The Strategies to Improve Donor Experiences (STRIDES) trial aims to reliably assess the impact of four different interventions to prevent VVRs among blood donors. Methods: STRIDES is a cluster-randomised cross-over/stepped-wedge factorial trial of four interventions to reduce VVRs involving about 1.4 million whole blood donors enrolled from all 73 blood donation sites (mobile teams and donor centres) of National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) in England. Each site (“cluster”) has been randomly allocated to receive one or more interventions during a 36-month period, using principles of cross-over, stepped-wedge and factorial trial design to assign the sequence of interventions. Each of the four interventions are compared to NHSBT’s current practices: (i) 500ml isotonic drink before donation vs current 500ml plain water; (ii) 3-minutes rest on donation chair after donation vs current 2 minutes; (iii) new modified AMT vs current practice of AMT; and (iv) psychosocial intervention using preparatory materials vs current practice of nothing. The primary outcome is the number of in-session VVRs with loss of consciousness (i.e., episodes involving loss of consciousness of any duration, with or without additional complications). Secondary outcomes include all in-session VVRs (i.e., with and without loss of consciousness) and delayed VVRs (i.e., those occurring after leaving the venue). Discussion: The STRIDES trial should yield novel information about interventions, singly and in combination, for the prevention of VVRs, with the aim of generating policy-shaping evidence to help inform blood services to improve donor health, donor experience, and service efficiency. Trial registration: ISRCTN: 10412338

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3