An inclusive multivariate approach to neural localization of language components

Author:

Graves William W.1,Levinson Hillary J.1,Staples Ryan1,Boukrina Olga2,Rothlein David3,Purcell Jeremy4

Affiliation:

1. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

2. Kessler Foundation

3. VA Boston Healthcare System

4. University of Maryland, College Park

Abstract

Abstract When attempting to determine how language is implemented in the brain, it is important to know what brain areas are and are not primarily responding to language. Existing protocols for localizing language are typically univariate, treating each small unit of brain volume as independent. One prominent example that focuses on the overall language network in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) uses a contrast between neural responses to sentences and sets of pseudowords (pronounceable nonwords). This approach reliably activates peri-sylvian language areas, but is less sensitive to extra-sylvian areas that are also known to support aspects of language such as word meanings (semantics). Here we test for areas where a multivariate, pattern-based approach shows high reproducibility across multiple measurements within participants, defining such areas as multivariate regions of interest (mROI). We then perform a representational similarity analysis (RSA) of an fMRI dataset where participants make familiarity judgments on written words. We also compare those results to univariate regions of interest (uROI) taken from previous sentences > pseudowords contrasts. RSA with word stimuli defined in terms of their semantic distance showed greater correspondence with neural patterns in mROI than uROI. This was confirmed in two independent datasets, one involving single-word recognition, and the other focused on the meaning of noun-noun phrases by contrasting meaningful phrases > pseudowords. In all cases, areas of spatial overlap between mROI and uROI showed the greatest neural association. This suggests that ROIs defined in terms of multivariate reproducibility can be used to localize components of language such as semantics. The multivariate approach can also be extended to focus on other aspects of language such as phonology, and can be used along with the univariate approach for inclusively mapping language cortex.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference89 articles.

1. Language mapping with fMRI: current standards and reproducibility;Agarwal S;Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging,2019

2. Alexander, M. P. (2003). Aphasia: Clinical and anatomic issues. In T. E. Feinberg & M. J. Farah (Eds.), Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychology (Second ed., pp. 147–164). McGraw-Hill.

3. Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words;Altarriba J;Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,1999

4. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database. (2.5 ed.) [CD-ROM]. Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania. http://celex.mpi.nl

5. Visual word recognition of single-syllable words;Balota DA;Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3