Delay of diagnosis of tumor in children and influence on prognosis. Experience of the AIEOP Centre of Bologna.
Author:
Rondelli Roberto1ORCID, Prete Arcangelo2, Belotti Tamara3, Masetti Riccardo4, Morigi Francesca4, Riolo Serena4, Battista Antonia Di2, Ronchini Laura2, Baccelli Francesco2, Gottardi Francesca2, Fois Maura2, Grasso Antonio2, Venturelli Francesco2, Mercolini Federico2, Legnani Elena Lara2, Cantarini Maria Elena2, Melchionda Fraia2, Facchini Elena2, Pession Andrea5
Affiliation:
1. Pediatric Oncology and Hematology Unit "Lalla Seràgnoli", IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna 2. Pediatric Oncology and Hematology Unit "Lalla Seragnoli", IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna 3. Pediatric Oncology and Hematology Unit "Lalla Seragnoli", IRCCS Azianda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna 4. Pediatric Oncology and Hematology Unit "Lalla Seragnoli", Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna 5. Pediatric Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna
Abstract
Abstract
Background The Pediatric Oncology and Hematology Unit Centre of Bologna adhere to the Italian Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Association (AIEOP) that since 1989 register any child diagnosed and treated with a malignant tumor, with the aim to quantify the number of cases diagnosed and treated, enter or not to official diagnostic-therapeutic protocols and the extraregional migration in the different Italian centres.Methods Data collection is performed adopting an ad-hoc form named Model 1.01 (Mod.1.01) through an electronic database open in the net to current 47 AIEOP Centres recruits annually about 1400 children (age 0–14 years) and 200 adolescents (age 15–19 years).Results From 1989 to 2018, out of 44730 AIEOP patients < 20 years at diagnosis, 1734 (3.9%) were accrued from Bologna Centre, 1528/1734 (88.1%) resulted resident in Italy and 877/1734 (50.6%) evaluable for this analysis. Most cases were ALL (343, 39.1%), followed by neuroblastoma (126, 14.4%), NHL (98, 11.2%), HL (66, 7.5%), ANLL (64, 7.3%), WT (56, 6.4%) and other types (124, 14.1%).Conclusions In order to evaluate the impact of a delay of diagnosis on outcome, with a mean of 4 days of latency between arrival to the center and diagnosis, OS for patients with < 4 days delay was significantly better than for patients with ≥ 4 days delay (p = 0.0236), resulting furthermore a prognostic factor such as age, diagnosis type and period of diagnosis in a multivariate fashion.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference14 articles.
1. Sistema di rilevazione dei casi di tumore maligno in età pediatrica in Italia su base ospedaliera;Pession A;Ital J Pediatr,2000 2. Collection and transfer of data: the AIEOP model;Pession A;Bone Marrow Transplant,2008 3. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations;Kaplan EL;J Am Stat Assoc,1958 4. Cox DR, Oakes D. Analysis of survival data. London: Chapman & Hall; 1984. 5. Stata Corp. Stata Statistical Software: College Station. TX, USA: Stata Corporation; 2000. Release 7.0.
|
|