Socially Vulnerable People and Stormwater infrastructure: A Geospatial Exploration of the Equitable Distribution of Gray and Green Stormwater Infrastructure in Washington D.C.

Author:

Park Minkyu1ORCID,Whiteheart Rachel Marie1,Alves Priscila Barros Ramalho1,Hendricks Marccus1

Affiliation:

1. University of Maryland School of Architecture Planning and Preservation

Abstract

Abstract Historically, hazard literature has used social vulnerability to describe how social stratification, based on race, income, education, gender, and other factors, differentially affects the risks and impacts that a given community experiences in a disaster event. Disaster literature also indicates that racially or socially marginalized communities often live in environments that have inadequate protective measures in place against disasters. Recent studies exploring green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) distribution from the perspective of environmental justice show that a high distribution of GSI, which can mitigate the impacts of flooding, significantly correlates with better-resourced communities. However, those studies do not show whether marginalized communities with less access to protective GSI are socially vulnerable or whether the vulnerable communities are relatively excluded from the flood mitigation benefits of stormwater infrastructure, linking the distribution of infrastructure only to specific socio-economic factors. Expanding the Pressure and Release (PAR) model of hazards and social vulnerability, this study explores the relationship between community social vulnerability and grey and green stormwater infrastructure distribution in Washington, D.C. by analyzing the correlation between social vulnerability indices, landscape and urbanization factors, and stormwater infrastructure capacity. The analysis reveals that both grey and green infrastructure capacity has statistically significant negative correlations with population density, imperviousness rate, and social vulnerability, suggesting that grey and green infrastructure is not equitably distributed throughout the city and that the areas of DC housing communities most vulnerable to disaster are those least served by DC’s grey and green infrastructure. Our findings show that the infrastructure separation from planning could raise an equity issue in terms of flooding and give support to the role of infrastructure as a mechanism that deepens social vulnerability. These findings require a broader role of planning that includes urban infrastructure elements and more collaborative works with engineers.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3