Evaluation of different adjuvant formulations of trivalent Foot and Mouth Disease vaccine in cattle
Author:
Ayele Getu1, Getachew Belayneh1, Bari Fufa Dawo2, Bayissa Berecha1, Muluneh Ayelech3, Abayneh Takele1, Gelaye Esayas1, Edao Bedaso Mammo2
Affiliation:
1. National Veterinary Institute 2. Addis Ababa University, Immunology and Vet Public Health 3. National animal health diagnostic and Investigation center
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Foot-and-mouth disease is globally one of the most economically important viral diseases of cloven-hoofed animals that can be controlled by different strategies, where vaccination plays an important role. Selection of the adjuvants,that added to the vaccine is crucial in ensuring the protective effect of the vaccine. Aluminum hydroxide gel and saponin (AS) is widely used adjuvant, with its poor immune response in FMD vaccine. The present study was undertaken to evaluate different ingredients of adjuvants for inactivated trivalent (A, O and SAT 2) FMD vaccine and to demonstrate the effect of booster dose in cattle.
Results
Cattle were grouped into five; four experimental and one control, with six animals in each group and immunized with trivalent vaccine with various formulations of adjuvants. Immune response was measured using Solid Phase Competitive Enzyme Linked Immune Sorbent Assay (SPCE). The antibody level in cattle immunised with a vaccine formulation containing a mixture of aluminum hydroxide gel and saponin (AS) were significantly lower than AS boosted group for the three serotypes (p < 0.05, t. test), which directs the need for booster dose. Whereas the antibody response in the AS + oil group was higher followed by oil alone, AS boosted and AS at 95% CI.
Conclusion
The findings of this study could suggest that oil based and AS with oil could replace the conventional aluminum hydroxide gel and saponin adjuvants in FMD vaccine preparations. On different note, challenge test was not successful in this study indicating the need for further research on the virus infectivity.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. 1. Asresie, A., Zemedu, L., and Adigrat, E. The contribution of livestock sector in Ethiopian economy. A Review Advances in Life Science and Technology, 2015; 29. 2. 2. Sulayeman, M., Dawo, F., Mammo, B., Gizaw, D., and Shegu, D. Isolation, molecular characterization and sero-prevalence study of foot-and-mouth disease virus circulating in central Ethiopia. BMC veterinary research, 2018; 14(1):110. 3. 3. Çokçalışkan, C., Türkoğlu, T., Sareyyüpoğlu, B., Uzunlu, E., Babak, A., Özbilge, B. B., and Gülyaz, V. QS-21 enhances the early antibody response to oil adjuvant foot-and-mouth disease vaccine in cattle. Clinical and experimental vaccine research, 2016; 5(2):138–147. 4. 4. Knight-Jones, T. J. D., and Rushton, J. The economic impacts of foot and mouth disease. what are they, how big are they and where do they occur? Preventive veterinary medicine, 2013; 112:161–173. 5. 5. Jamal, S. M., and Belsham, G. J. Foot-and-mouth disease: past, present and future. Veterinary research, 2013; 44(1):1–14.
|
|