Frontline and forgotten: Community nurses’ experience of shielding during COVID-19

Author:

Stenson Sophie1,Arfanis Konstantinos2

Affiliation:

1. Independent researcher

2. Arden University

Abstract

Abstract In March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic reached the United Kingdom. National and local lockdowns became the new reality as the pandemic had a significant effect on morbidity and mortality, especially amongst vulnerable groups of the population. It was people in these groups in particular that were advised to shield at home. There are a number of studies focusing on the psychological effect of this enforced isolation on the general population; however, to the researchers’ knowledge, the effects shielding on healthcare professionals has not received a similar level of attention. The general population has expressed its appreciation to frontline healthcare professionals, with the majority of praise directed towards doctors and nurses working for the National Health Service. It must be noted that community nurses working for the private sector do not appear to have been officially afforded the same recognition, and research on the psychological effect the pandemic had on these healthcare professionals is lacking. The primary researcher identified this gap in the literature which became one of the reasons for the present study. This study enlisted the participation of ten community nurses working in the private sector who experienced shielding due to a long-term health condition. Participants were all female and aged between 24 and 63 years, and each attended a semi-structured interview. These interviews consisted of nine open-ended questions exploring these nurses’ experiences and the psychological effects COVID-19 and shielding had on them. Grounded Theory was favoured as the analytical technique, identifying eleven core themes. Social Identity Theory informed the evaluation of the data. Nurses reported an array of, psychological effects, varying from mild to severe. According to participants, employer recognition and staying connected with colleagues are vital for the maintenance of their social and professional identity and, psychological well-being.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference48 articles.

1. Baron RA, Branscombe NR. Social Psychology. 13th ed.: Pearson Education Limited; 2014.

2. The impact of COVID-19 on small business outcomes and expectations;Bartik AW;Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,2020

3. BBC Newsround. (2020). Coronavirus: five ways people are showing love for NHS staff. Retrieved January 14, 2022, from https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/52116882.

4. British Psychological Society. (2021). BPS code of human research ethics. Retrieved November 02, 2021, from https://www.bps.org.uk/news-and-policy/bps-code-human-research-ethics.

5. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed.: SAGE Publications Limited; 2014.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3