Relational security as the core of the security framework: the interplay with physical- and procedural security and the broader institutional context

Author:

Souverein Fleur1,Mulder Eva1,Domburgh Lieke van1,Popma Arne1

Affiliation:

1. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry & Psychosocial Care department Amsterdam UMC

Abstract

Abstract Background Given the developmental vulnerability of justice-involved youth, providing a safe environment in secure facilities is a paramount, yet challenging task. Therefore, a sound security framework is crucial. Existing knowledge emphasizes the importance of a shift in focus on physical- and procedural security towards relational security. At the same time there is a lack of knowledge on relational security, particularly in the context of youth justice. This paper explores: 1) How relational security, as the core of the security framework, relates to physical- and procedural security; 2) What are organizational determinants for effective relational security as the core of the security framework? Method This paper is based on findings of a three-year evaluation of three small-scaled, community-embedded facilities that are grounded in relational security. The approach of the evaluation was derived from action research: a cyclic process alternating between action, research and critical reflection, including a total of 63 semi-structured interviews with staff, youth and parents. Results The security framework is a systemic model: all three forms of security (relational, physical, procedural) need to be in place. Staff, youth and parents describe several mechanism that direct how these three security dimensions may be appropriately balanced attuned to youth’s individual needs and strengths. In addition various determinants at different organizational levels were identified: target population, suited professionals, team collaboration, group composition, activities, method and institutional policies, organization vision and culture, facility design, stakeholder network, and legislation and politics. Conclusion Relational security can be defined in a practical conceptualization within the dynamics of the security framework; outlining a vision, way of working and the conducive conditions for implementation.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference33 articles.

1. UNCRC. Treaty no. 27531. In: United Nations Treaty Series, 1577, Article 37, pp. 16. 1989. https://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/1990/09/19900902%2003-14%20AM/Ch_IV_11p.pdf. Accessed 03 Jan 2023.

2. Serious juvenile offenders: Classification into subgroups based on static and dynamic characteristics;Hillege SL;Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health,2017

3. One size does not fit all: A systematic review of training outcomes on residential youth care professionals' skills;Eenshuistra A;Child Youth Serv Rev,2019

4. Working with complex problem behaviors in juvenile institutional care: Staff's competence, organizational conditions and public value;Ahonen L;Int J Prison Health,2014

5. The security needs assessment profile: A multidimensional approach to measuring security needs;Collins M;Int J Forensic Ment Health,2005

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3