Reexamining the Evidence-Based Practices Attitude Scale-36 (EBPAS-36) in a U.S. Sample of Trauma-Focused Treatment Providers

Author:

Mersky Joshua P.1ORCID,Lee ChienTi Plummer2,Bacalso Edwin2,Liu Xiyao2

Affiliation:

1. UW-Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

2. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Abstract

Abstract Background Mental health providers’ attitudes toward evidence-based practice are likely to influence what interventions they learn, implement, and sustain over time. Extending research on the 15-item Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS), a 36-item version of the EBPAS was recently developed to assess provider attitudes more comprehensively. Research suggests the EBPAS-36 is a promising tool, though inconsistencies across studies suggest there is a need to reexamine its validity and reliability. Methods This study assessed the factorial structure of the EBPAS-36, the intercorrelations and reliabilities of its subscales, and correlates of practice attitudes in a U.S. sample of 445 practitioners who received training in trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy. Results A confirmatory factor analysis verified that the EBPAS-36 fits a 12-factor model representing each of its subscales. Reinforcing prior results, the subscales of the EBPAS-36 were weakly to moderately correlated, suggesting that the 12 domains are related yet distinct. A hypothesized second-order model with three overarching latent factors was not validated, but an alternative two-factor model fit the data adequately. Most subscales demonstrated good-to-excellent internal consistency, though values for the appeal, divergence, and balance subscales ranged from marginally acceptable to poor. Provider attitudes varied by gender, professional experience, and discipline. Practitioners who more frequently assessed client trauma symptoms reported more positive EBP attitudes, and those who expressed greater concerns that trauma assessments may cause harm reported more negative attitudes. Conclusions Taken together with previous findings, the results suggest the EBPAS-36 performs well overall, though some subscales may benefit from refinement. Further validation tests of the EBPAS-36 in diverse samples are warranted.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference58 articles.

1. US National and State-Level Prevalence of Mental Health Disorders and Disparities of Mental Health Care Use in Children;Whitney DG;JAMA Pediatr,2019

2. Dvir Y, Ford JD, Hill M, Frazier JA, Childhood Maltreatment E, Dysregulation, Comorbidities P. Harvard Review of Psychiatry [Internet]. 2014;22(3):149–61. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4091823/.

3. Inequitable Experiences and Outcomes in Young Children: Addressing Racial and Social-Economic Disparities in Physical and Mental Health;Jones Harden B;Annual Rev Dev Psychol,2022

4. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of depression in children and adolescents after exposure to trauma;Vibhakar V;J Affect Disord,2019

5. Racial and ethnic disparities in pediatric mental health;Alegria M;Child Adolesc Psychiatric Clin,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3