Open Innovation in Healthcare Ecosystem – a systematic review

Author:

Torab-Miandoab Amir1,Samad-Soltani Taha1,Rezaei-hachesu Peyman1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Information Technology, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract

Abstract Background: Several countries are facing significant troubles of health services, particularly rising prices. Innovative technologies and services are expected to help boost medical quality and cut costs. In this sense, there is a lack of innovative work in spite of a growing interest in open innovation and approaches that advocate for expanded cooperation among various actors in healthcare. Objective: This paper describes the findings of a study concerning the commitment of the healthcare sector to open innovation. Materials and methods: The search for literature focused on English-language papers to 12 January 2020. Based on the indicated criteria for inclusion, 29 articles were included. Results: Results show that most experiments concentrate on the areas of pharmaceutical research (drug discovery) and health informatics (health information systems and infrastructures) that were brought out as concepts or applied as pilot and prototype. Conclusions: The participation of the healthcare sector limited in open innovation, and more work is required with an emphasis how to get open innovation.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference61 articles.

1. Alawamleh M, Ismail LB, Aladwan K, et al. (2018) The influence of open/closed innovation on employees’ performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis.

2. Allarakhia M. (2015) Exploring open innovation with a patient focus in drug discovery: an evolving paradigm of patient engagement. Taylor & Francis.

3. Almirall E & Wareham J. (2008) Living labs and open innovation: Roles and applicability. eJOV: The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organization & Networks 10.

4. Andersson ER, Lundblad J & Jansson B. (2011) The yield of an open innovation arena for occupational health and safety ideas in the Swedish construction industry. International Journal of Innovation Science.

5. Baltes G & Gard J. (2010) Living Labs as intermediary in open innovation: On the role of entrepreneurial support. 2010 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE). IEEE, 1–10.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3