Knowledge and Barriers of Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest Bystander Intervention and Public Access Automated External Defibrillator Use in the Northeast of England. A Cross-sectional Survey Study.

Author:

Dew Rosie1ORCID,Norton Michael1,Aitken-Fell Paul2,Blance Phil2,Miles Steven2,Potts Sean2,Wilkes Scott1

Affiliation:

1. University of Sunderland Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing

2. North East Ambulance Service NHS Trust: North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Intervention by members of the public during an out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHAC) including resuscitation attempts and accessible automated external defibrillator (AED) has been shown to improve survival. This study aimed to investigate the OHCA and AED knowledge and confidence, and barriers to intervention, of the public of North East England, UK Methods: This study used a face-to-face cross-sectional survey on a public high street in Newcastle, UK. Participants were asked unprompted to explain what they would do when faced with an OHCA collapse. Chi-Square analysis was used to test the association of the independent variables sex and first aid trained on the participants’ responses. Results: Of the 421 participants recruited to our study, 82.9% (n=349) reported that they would know what to do during an OHCA collapse. The most frequent OHCA action mentioned was call 999 (64.1%, n=270/421) and 58.2% (n=245/421) of participants reported that they would commence CPR. However, only 14.3% (n=60/421) of participants spontaneously mentioned that they would locate an AED, while only 4.5% (n=19/421) recounted that they would apply the AED. Just over half of participants (50.8%, n=214/421) were first aid trained, with statistically more females than males being first aiders (p=0.01 χ2=7.41). Most participants (80.3%, n=338/421) knew what an AED was, and 34.7% (n=326/421) reported that they knew how to use one, however, only 11.9% (n=50/421) mentioned that they would actually shock a patient. Being first aid trained increased the likelihood of freely recounting actions for OHCA and AED intervention. The most common barrier to helping during an OHCA was lack of knowledge (29.9%, n=126/421) Conclusion: Although most participants reported they would know what to do during an OHCA and had knowledge of an AED, low numbers of participants spontaneously mentioned specific OHCA and AED actions. Improving public knowledge would help improve the public’s confidence of intervening during an OHCA and may improve OHCA survival.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference50 articles.

1. Resuscitation Council UK, Publication Consensus Paper on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in England 2015 [Available from: https://www.resus.org.uk/library/publications/publication-consensus-paper-out-hospital-cardiac-arrest

2. Perkins GD, Nolan JP, Soar J, Hawkes C, Wyllie J, Skellett S et al Epidemiology of cardiac arrest Guidelines 2021 [Available from: https://www.resus.org.uk/library/2021-resuscitation-guidelines/epidemiology-cardiac-arrest-guidelines

3. Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Sasson C;Circualtion: Cardiovascualr Quality and Outcomes,2010

4. Impact of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation on neurologically intact survival in out-ofhospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review;Eberhard KE;Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med,2021

5. The effects of public access defibrillation on survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review of observational studies;Baekgaard JS;Circulation,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3